Multi-spatial scale assessment and multi-dataset fusion of global terrestrial evapotranspiration datasets

Abstract. Evapotranspiration (ET) is an important component of the terrestrial water cycle, carbon cycle, and energy balance. Currently, there are four main types of ET datasets: remote sensing–based, machine learning–based, reanalysis–based, and land–surface–model–based. However, most existing ET fusion datasets rely on a single type of ET dataset, limiting their ability to effectively capture regional ET variations. This limitation hinders accurate quantification of the terrestrial water balance and understanding of climate change impacts. In this study, the accuracy and uncertainty of thirty ET datasets (across all four types) are evaluated at multiple spatial scales, and a fusion dataset BMA (Bayesian model averaging)-ET, is obtained using BMA method and dynamic weighting scheme. ET from FLUXNET2015 as reference, the study recommends remote sensing- and machine learning-based ET datasets, especially Model Tree Ensemble Evapotranspiration (MTE), Penman-Monteith-Leuning (PML) and Process-based Land Surface Evapotranspiration/Heat Fluxes (PLSH), but the optimal selection depends on season and vegetation type. At the basin scale, most of ET datasets demonstrate superior performance. Relative uncertainty based on remote sensing and machine learning is low at the grid point scale. The fusion dataset BMA-ET accurately captures trends in ET, showing a global terrestrial increasing trend of 0.65 (0.51–0.78) mm yr−1 during the period 1980–2020. BMA-ET has higher correlation coefficients and lower root-mean-square errors than most individual ET datasets. Validation using ET from FLUXNET2015 as reference shows that correlation coefficients of more than 70 % of the flux sites exceed 0.6. Validation results based on independent data sources show that the correlation coefficients of BMA-ET with AmeriFlux, ChinaFlux, and ICOS reach 0.61, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively. Overall, BMA-ET provides a comprehensive, long-term resource for understanding global ET patterns and trends, addressing the limitation of prior ET fusion efforts. Free access to the dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15470621 (Wu and Miao, 2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth system science data
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6445-2025
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-spatial scale assessment and multi-dataset fusion of global terrestrial evapotranspiration datasets

Qi Zhang, Yuanfang Chai, Chiyuan Miao, Yiying Wang et al.
Earth system science data
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Multi-spatial scale assessment and multi-dataset fusion of global terrestrial evapotranspiration datasets

Qi Zhang, Yuanfang Chai, Chiyuan Miao, Yiying Wang, Yi Wu, Jiachen Ji
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Evapotranspiration (ET) is an important component of the terrestrial water cycle, carbon cycle, and energy balance. Currently, there are four main types of ET datasets: remote sensing–based, machine learning–based, reanalysis–based, and land–surface–model–based. However, most existing ET fusion datasets rely on a single type of ET dataset, limiting their ability to effectively capture regional ET variations. This limitation hinders accurate quantification of the terrestrial water balance and understanding of climate change impacts. In this study, the accuracy and uncertainty of thirty ET datasets (across all four types) are evaluated at multiple spatial scales, and a fusion dataset BMA (Bayesian model averaging)-ET, is obtained using BMA method and dynamic weighting scheme. ET from FLUXNET2015 as reference, the study recommends remote sensing- and machine learning-based ET datasets, especially Model Tree Ensemble Evapotranspiration (MTE), Penman-Monteith-Leuning (PML) and Process-based Land Surface Evapotranspiration/Heat Fluxes (PLSH), but the optimal selection depends on season and vegetation type. At the basin scale, most of ET datasets demonstrate superior performance. Relative uncertainty based on remote sensing and machine learning is low at the grid point scale. The fusion dataset BMA-ET accurately captures trends in ET, showing a global terrestrial increasing trend of 0.65 (0.51–0.78) mm yr−1 during the period 1980–2020. BMA-ET has higher correlation coefficients and lower root-mean-square errors than most individual ET datasets. Validation using ET from FLUXNET2015 as reference shows that correlation coefficients of more than 70 % of the flux sites exceed 0.6. Validation results based on independent data sources show that the correlation coefficients of BMA-ET with AmeriFlux, ChinaFlux, and ICOS reach 0.61, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively. Overall, BMA-ET provides a comprehensive, long-term resource for understanding global ET patterns and trends, addressing the limitation of prior ET fusion efforts. Free access to the dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15470621 (Wu and Miao, 2025).

Earth system science dataVol. 17(11)
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.