The evolving definition of quality: how teacher experience and subject domain shape perceptions of instructional materials

Introduction Despite substantial global investment in curricular resources, surprisingly little empirical research has explored how teachers themselves define and evaluate the quality of instructional materials, particularly as these perceptions evolve across different stages of the teaching career. This study examined how teachers’ approaches to evaluating instructional material quality evolve across career stages. Methods We surveyed 2,102 educators from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, all active users of the eduki platform. Through exploratory factor analysis and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), we identified three distinct response patterns in how teachers evaluate materials: teacher perceptions of peer-created material quality, pedagogical and structural characteristics of high-quality materials, and teacher-centric considerations and practical benefits. Results Teachers’ priorities across these evaluation approaches vary significantly with experience. The overall MANOVA was statistically significant (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.89, F (81, 4,476) = 1.97, p < 0.001). Early-career teachers emphasize peer-created materials for lesson delivery (M = 4.34, SD = 0.69) and professional development (M = 3.88, SD = 0.87), along with stimulating content (M = 4.16, SD = 0.95) and curriculum compliance (M = 3.85, SD = 0.96). In contrast, experienced teachers prioritize practical benefits such as ease of use (M = 3.84, SD = 0.93), technology integration (M = 3.29, SD = 0.94), support for diverse learning needs (M = 3.85, SD = 0.88), and inclusion of current research (M = 3.34, SD = 0.90), with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (d = −0.33 to 0.54). The greatest differences were observed between early-career and experienced teachers. Discussion These findings indicate that quality evaluation is a developmental process that evolves with teaching expertise. We propose a career-responsive approach to material development with implications for content design, professional development, and platform personalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1671376
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolving definition of quality: how teacher experience and subject domain shape perceptions of instructional materials

John Hattie, Lola Garay Abad
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Literacy, Media, and Education
15.18
article

The evolving definition of quality: how teacher experience and subject domain shape perceptions of instructional materials

John Hattie, Lola Garay Abad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Despite substantial global investment in curricular resources, surprisingly little empirical research has explored how teachers themselves define and evaluate the quality of instructional materials, particularly as these perceptions evolve across different stages of the teaching career. This study examined how teachers’ approaches to evaluating instructional material quality evolve across career stages. Methods We surveyed 2,102 educators from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, all active users of the eduki platform. Through exploratory factor analysis and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), we identified three distinct response patterns in how teachers evaluate materials: teacher perceptions of peer-created material quality, pedagogical and structural characteristics of high-quality materials, and teacher-centric considerations and practical benefits. Results Teachers’ priorities across these evaluation approaches vary significantly with experience. The overall MANOVA was statistically significant (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.89, F (81, 4,476) = 1.97, p < 0.001). Early-career teachers emphasize peer-created materials for lesson delivery (M = 4.34, SD = 0.69) and professional development (M = 3.88, SD = 0.87), along with stimulating content (M = 4.16, SD = 0.95) and curriculum compliance (M = 3.85, SD = 0.96). In contrast, experienced teachers prioritize practical benefits such as ease of use (M = 3.84, SD = 0.93), technology integration (M = 3.29, SD = 0.94), support for diverse learning needs (M = 3.85, SD = 0.88), and inclusion of current research (M = 3.34, SD = 0.90), with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (d = −0.33 to 0.54). The greatest differences were observed between early-career and experienced teachers. Discussion These findings indicate that quality evaluation is a developmental process that evolves with teaching expertise. We propose a career-responsive approach to material development with implications for content design, professional development, and platform personalization.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU), Nokia (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Literacy, Media, and Education
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.