Challenges of assessing acceptability in the context of cancer screening: a behavioral science perspective

In response to an increased focus on acceptability research in healthcare, this perspective paper highlights the challenges of assessing acceptability and the need for, and importance of, further work to develop best practice guidelines for evaluating the acceptability of cancer screening. We report the results of a rapid consultation consensus survey carried out to explore the extent of conceptual, methodological, and translational challenges shared by those involved in assessing the acceptability of cancer screening. Our findings demonstrate that the current lack of consensus regarding the conceptualization and definition of acceptability is a key challenge which gives rise to further methodological and translational issues. The implications of the challenges experienced by those assessing the acceptability of cancer screening are discussed from a behavioral science perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcacs.2025.1608009
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of assessing acceptability in the context of cancer screening: a behavioral science perspective

Lauren Gatting, Emma Lidington, C. Jones, Jo Waller et al.
Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Challenges of assessing acceptability in the context of cancer screening: a behavioral science perspective

Lauren Gatting, Emma Lidington, C. Jones, Jo Waller, Lorna McWilliams, Ninian Schmeising-Barnes, Evangelos Katsampouris, Lily C. Taylor, Suzanne E. Scott, Siobain F Bonfield
article en

Abstract

In response to an increased focus on acceptability research in healthcare, this perspective paper highlights the challenges of assessing acceptability and the need for, and importance of, further work to develop best practice guidelines for evaluating the acceptability of cancer screening. We report the results of a rapid consultation consensus survey carried out to explore the extent of conceptual, methodological, and translational challenges shared by those involved in assessing the acceptability of cancer screening. Our findings demonstrate that the current lack of consensus regarding the conceptualization and definition of acceptability is a key challenge which gives rise to further methodological and translational issues. The implications of the challenges experienced by those assessing the acceptability of cancer screening are discussed from a behavioral science perspective.

Frontiers in Cancer Control and SocietyVol. 3
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Barts Charity, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.