Your project or our project? Evaluating the participatory development of an adolescent healthy sleep intervention

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) is a promising approach to develop health promotion interventions, but more evaluation is necessary to optimize collaboration with youth. This study evaluates the participatory process of developing a school-based healthy sleep intervention from the perspective of participating adolescents. In three schools, action teams (n = 3-12, 13-15-year-olds) held weekly sessions (n = 29-34 per school) guided by the theory-based Intervention Mapping protocol to develop school-specific interventions. Based on scientific principles of YPAR and empowerment theory, the way of operating, capacity building, feeling heard, ownership, level of participation, empowerment and group dynamic was evaluated through focus groups with each action team at four time points during the process. Thematic content analysis was performed using NVivo 11, resulting in eight themes: (1) overall experience of the participatory project, (2) motivation to join the action team, (3) action team composition and collaboration, (4) role of the researcher, (5) participatory sessions, (6) participatory principles, (7) school support and (8) the participatory developed intervention. The action teams reported learning about sleep hygiene, project management and social interactions. Adolescents felt empowered and ownership through shared decision making. They appreciated the structure brought by the researcher and indicated the good relationship with the researcher to be important. Future researchers should consider using more active methods during the third step of Intervention Mapping and involving important other stakeholders earlier in the participatory process, to create support for and familiarity with the intervention amongst all stakeholders before implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25667-9
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Your project or our project? Evaluating the participatory development of an adolescent healthy sleep intervention

Ann Vandendriessche, Karlien Dhondt, Benedicte Deforche, Teatske M. Altenburg et al.
BMC Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Your project or our project? Evaluating the participatory development of an adolescent healthy sleep intervention

Ann Vandendriessche, Karlien Dhondt, Benedicte Deforche, Teatske M. Altenburg, Babette Demeester
article en

Abstract

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) is a promising approach to develop health promotion interventions, but more evaluation is necessary to optimize collaboration with youth. This study evaluates the participatory process of developing a school-based healthy sleep intervention from the perspective of participating adolescents. In three schools, action teams (n = 3-12, 13-15-year-olds) held weekly sessions (n = 29-34 per school) guided by the theory-based Intervention Mapping protocol to develop school-specific interventions. Based on scientific principles of YPAR and empowerment theory, the way of operating, capacity building, feeling heard, ownership, level of participation, empowerment and group dynamic was evaluated through focus groups with each action team at four time points during the process. Thematic content analysis was performed using NVivo 11, resulting in eight themes: (1) overall experience of the participatory project, (2) motivation to join the action team, (3) action team composition and collaboration, (4) role of the researcher, (5) participatory sessions, (6) participatory principles, (7) school support and (8) the participatory developed intervention. The action teams reported learning about sleep hygiene, project management and social interactions. Adolescents felt empowered and ownership through shared decision making. They appreciated the structure brought by the researcher and indicated the good relationship with the researcher to be important. Future researchers should consider using more active methods during the third step of Intervention Mapping and involving important other stakeholders earlier in the participatory process, to create support for and familiarity with the intervention amongst all stakeholders before implementation.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.