Building beyond profit: the history and potential future of non-profit construction companies

When housing construction slows down due to diminished profit margins while the actual need for housing increases, people might raise the question: is residential construction best left to the capitalist market? What about introducing other ownership structures not dependent on sustained and rising profits? These are the same questions we raise in this paper, which examines Sweden’s long and prominent history of alternative ownership structures in the residential construction sector, including the rise and fall of public and large-scale union-owned construction companies in the twentieth century. After these vanished in the 1990s, the dominant approach to the recurrent problems in the sector has been limited to demand-side interventions and deregulation. This paper draws on the Swedish house building history to tackle the question of whether construction companies with alternative ownership structures and relationships to profit should – and could – be reintroduced into the sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2025.2577722
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building beyond profit: the history and potential future of non-profit construction companies

Ståle Holgersen, Maria Wallstam
Housing Studies
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Building beyond profit: the history and potential future of non-profit construction companies

Ståle Holgersen, Maria Wallstam
article en

Abstract

When housing construction slows down due to diminished profit margins while the actual need for housing increases, people might raise the question: is residential construction best left to the capitalist market? What about introducing other ownership structures not dependent on sustained and rising profits? These are the same questions we raise in this paper, which examines Sweden’s long and prominent history of alternative ownership structures in the residential construction sector, including the rise and fall of public and large-scale union-owned construction companies in the twentieth century. After these vanished in the 1990s, the dominant approach to the recurrent problems in the sector has been limited to demand-side interventions and deregulation. This paper draws on the Swedish house building history to tackle the question of whether construction companies with alternative ownership structures and relationships to profit should – and could – be reintroduced into the sector.

Housing Studies
Uppsala University (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AU)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Norges Forskningsråd, Uppsala Universitet, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.