Distraction Osteogenesis and Orthognathic Surgery for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review

ABSTRACT Background Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is the most prevalent craniofacial malformation, frequently associated with maxillary hypoplasia, velopharyngeal dysfunction and aesthetic alterations that compromise quality of life. Among surgical strategies, orthognathic surgery (OS) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) remain the most widely applied techniques for correction of maxillary deficiencies in CLP patients. Objective This literature review focuses on analysing and synthesising the current evidence on the most commonly used OS and DO techniques in patients with CLP, highlighting their indications, results and limitations. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Taylor and Francis, including clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in the last 15 years. Results OS provides immediate correction of moderate maxillofacial deformities and improves occlusion and facial harmony, but carries a considerable risk of relapse and velopharyngeal dysfunction. In contrast, DO enables gradual skeletal advancement with superior long‐term stability and better soft tissue adaptation, though it requires prolonged treatment and tolerance to distraction devices. Recent evidence indicates that hybrid and segmental distraction techniques may further enhance stability and reduce complications. Conclusion The choice between OS and DO should be individualised according to the severity of maxillary hypoplasia, patient age, and functional‐aesthetic objectives. While OS remains effective for moderate corrections, DO demonstrates advantages in severe cases. Multicenter studies with standardised protocols are needed to strengthen long‐term evidence and optimise surgical decision‐making in CLP management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Surgery
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.70024
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distraction Osteogenesis and Orthognathic Surgery for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review

Santiago Reinoso Quezada, Conie Micaela Alvarado Gualpa
Oral Surgery
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Distraction Osteogenesis and Orthognathic Surgery for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review

Santiago Reinoso Quezada, Conie Micaela Alvarado Gualpa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is the most prevalent craniofacial malformation, frequently associated with maxillary hypoplasia, velopharyngeal dysfunction and aesthetic alterations that compromise quality of life. Among surgical strategies, orthognathic surgery (OS) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) remain the most widely applied techniques for correction of maxillary deficiencies in CLP patients. Objective This literature review focuses on analysing and synthesising the current evidence on the most commonly used OS and DO techniques in patients with CLP, highlighting their indications, results and limitations. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Taylor and Francis, including clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in the last 15 years. Results OS provides immediate correction of moderate maxillofacial deformities and improves occlusion and facial harmony, but carries a considerable risk of relapse and velopharyngeal dysfunction. In contrast, DO enables gradual skeletal advancement with superior long‐term stability and better soft tissue adaptation, though it requires prolonged treatment and tolerance to distraction devices. Recent evidence indicates that hybrid and segmental distraction techniques may further enhance stability and reduce complications. Conclusion The choice between OS and DO should be individualised according to the severity of maxillary hypoplasia, patient age, and functional‐aesthetic objectives. While OS remains effective for moderate corrections, DO demonstrates advantages in severe cases. Multicenter studies with standardised protocols are needed to strengthen long‐term evidence and optimise surgical decision‐making in CLP management.

Oral Surgery
Universidad Católica de Cuenca (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.