Examining provider responses to pain during first obstetric physical exams

Pain during gynecologic exams is prevalent and the quality of provider communication can shape how patients experience and perceive it. This secondary analysis examined provider responses to patients' verbal expressions of pain during initial obstetric physical exams. Audio-recorded and transcribed data from 200 first prenatal visits, randomly selected from a larger National Institutes of Health-funded communication study, was analyzed for instances of pain expression and corresponding provider responses. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between provider and patient characteristics and response types. Fifty providers conducted exams with a diverse patient cohort (mean age 25.4 years; 45.6 percent Black, 38.6 percent White, 15.8 percent Multiracial). Patients vocalized pain in over one-quarter of exams, with providers responding with supportive and non-supportive communication. Providers acknowledged or apologized for pain in 63.2 percent of these encounters and offered positive reinforcement in 33.3 percent. In contrast, pain was referred to as something else in 22.8 percent of exams and ignored in 19.3 percent. Providers were more likely to offer no verbal response when a third-party person was present (OR 5.3, 95 percent CI 1.3-22.4). Findings indicate that pain is frequently expressed and variably addressed even during routine obstetric exams. Educational interventions for gynecologic examination training should emphasize empathetic, trauma-informed communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women & Health
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2590692
Primary Topic
Maternal and fetal healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining provider responses to pain during first obstetric physical exams

Judy C. Chang, Abisola Olaniyan, Thành Nguyễn
Women & Health
Maternal and fetal healthcare
article

Examining provider responses to pain during first obstetric physical exams

Judy C. Chang, Abisola Olaniyan, Thành Nguyễn
article en

Abstract

Pain during gynecologic exams is prevalent and the quality of provider communication can shape how patients experience and perceive it. This secondary analysis examined provider responses to patients' verbal expressions of pain during initial obstetric physical exams. Audio-recorded and transcribed data from 200 first prenatal visits, randomly selected from a larger National Institutes of Health-funded communication study, was analyzed for instances of pain expression and corresponding provider responses. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between provider and patient characteristics and response types. Fifty providers conducted exams with a diverse patient cohort (mean age 25.4 years; 45.6 percent Black, 38.6 percent White, 15.8 percent Multiracial). Patients vocalized pain in over one-quarter of exams, with providers responding with supportive and non-supportive communication. Providers acknowledged or apologized for pain in 63.2 percent of these encounters and offered positive reinforcement in 33.3 percent. In contrast, pain was referred to as something else in 22.8 percent of exams and ignored in 19.3 percent. Providers were more likely to offer no verbal response when a third-party person was present (OR 5.3, 95 percent CI 1.3-22.4). Findings indicate that pain is frequently expressed and variably addressed even during routine obstetric exams. Educational interventions for gynecologic examination training should emphasize empathetic, trauma-informed communication.

Women & HealthVol. 65(9)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Maternal and fetal healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.