Association of hospital volume with perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive thymectomy

Background: Thymectomy is an uncommon procedure, and operative experience may influence outcomes.We examined the association between center-level operative volume using the National Readmissions Database (NRD) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB).These databases provide complementary insights into short-and long-term outcomes.We hypothesized that perioperative morbidity would be similar in high-volume (HV) centers and low-volume (LV) centers, but long-term survival and R0 resection-especially for minimally invasive (MI) thymectomy-would be superior in HV centers. Methods: Patients from the NRD (2017-2020) and NCDB (2010-2015 and 2018-2021) diagnosed with thymoma or thymic carcinoma who underwent thymectomy were included.(NCDB 2016-2017 was excluded for missing stage data.)The top quartile defined HV centers from LV centers.The Pearson 2 test was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Logistic regression assessed factors associated with in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and R0 resection.Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated long-term survival.Results: In NRD analysis (n = 3127 patients), MI thymectomy was more frequent in HV centers (57.4% vs 40.9%:P<.001).No differences were found in adjusted 30day mortality (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.69-5.77;P = .20)or postoperative complications (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19;P = .65).In NCDB analysis (n = 3798 patients) HV centers were associated with improved 10-year survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97;P = .02)and decreased R1/R2 resection (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92;P = .004).MI thymectomies at HV centers were associated with a higher rate of R0 resection for stage I and stage II disease (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.73;P = .001]and HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.97;P = .004],respectively).Conclusions: Perioperative outcomes were similar irrespective of center volume, but HV centers demonstrated improved rates of R0 resection and long-term survival even with an MI approach to thymectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.016
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of hospital volume with perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive thymectomy

Takashi Harano, Anthony W. Kim, Brooks V. Udelsman, Graeme Rosenberg et al.
JTCVS Open
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Association of hospital volume with perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive thymectomy

Takashi Harano, Anthony W. Kim, Brooks V. Udelsman, Graeme Rosenberg, Sean C. Wightman, Li Ding, Scott M. Atay, H. Sidhu, Erin Yu
article en

Abstract

Background: Thymectomy is an uncommon procedure, and operative experience may influence outcomes.We examined the association between center-level operative volume using the National Readmissions Database (NRD) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB).These databases provide complementary insights into short-and long-term outcomes.We hypothesized that perioperative morbidity would be similar in high-volume (HV) centers and low-volume (LV) centers, but long-term survival and R0 resection-especially for minimally invasive (MI) thymectomy-would be superior in HV centers. Methods: Patients from the NRD (2017-2020) and NCDB (2010-2015 and 2018-2021) diagnosed with thymoma or thymic carcinoma who underwent thymectomy were included.(NCDB 2016-2017 was excluded for missing stage data.)The top quartile defined HV centers from LV centers.The Pearson 2 test was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Logistic regression assessed factors associated with in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and R0 resection.Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated long-term survival.Results: In NRD analysis (n = 3127 patients), MI thymectomy was more frequent in HV centers (57.4% vs 40.9%:P<.001).No differences were found in adjusted 30day mortality (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.69-5.77;P = .20)or postoperative complications (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19;P = .65).In NCDB analysis (n = 3798 patients) HV centers were associated with improved 10-year survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97;P = .02)and decreased R1/R2 resection (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92;P = .004).MI thymectomies at HV centers were associated with a higher rate of R0 resection for stage I and stage II disease (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.73;P = .001]and HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.97;P = .004],respectively).Conclusions: Perioperative outcomes were similar irrespective of center volume, but HV centers demonstrated improved rates of R0 resection and long-term survival even with an MI approach to thymectomy.

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
University of Southern California (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.