Efficacy and safety analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

New treatment strategies are needed for patients who relapse during or following first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) rechallenge aims to reactivate the immune system's response to tumor cells and may improve the prognosis of patients who progressed during or after completing previous treatment. The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of second-line ICI rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced ESCC. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with advanced ESCC at the Department of Oncology of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (January 2021 to June 2023) who had at least one measurable lesion at progression after first-line immunotherapy, received at least two cycles of second-line treatment, and who had subsequently undergone radiographic response assessment. The primary outcomes of interest were the progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events were also recorded. In the ICI rechallenge and non-ICI rechallenge groups, the objective response rate (ORR) was 15.4% and 11.8%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.6% and 44.1% (<i>P</i> = .011). Compared with the non-ICI rechallenge group, median PFS2 in the ICI rechallenge group was significantly prolonged (5.63 <i>vs</i>. 3.03 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.73; <i>P</i> = .001), while there was no statistically significant difference in median OS (12.33 <i>vs</i>. 7.10 months, HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.27; <i>P</i> = .344). ICI rechallenge therapy and radiotherapy administered during second-line treatment were recognized as independent predictive factors influencing PFS2. These findings suggest that second-line ICI rechallenge is tolerable and could benefit a subset of patients with advanced ESCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2591463
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

D. Liu, Min Wang, Xiaohua Wang, Ting Qian et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Efficacy and safety analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

D. Liu, Min Wang, Xiaohua Wang, Ting Qian, Fei Yan, Guochun Cao, Lukun Guo
article en

Abstract

New treatment strategies are needed for patients who relapse during or following first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) rechallenge aims to reactivate the immune system's response to tumor cells and may improve the prognosis of patients who progressed during or after completing previous treatment. The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of second-line ICI rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced ESCC. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with advanced ESCC at the Department of Oncology of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (January 2021 to June 2023) who had at least one measurable lesion at progression after first-line immunotherapy, received at least two cycles of second-line treatment, and who had subsequently undergone radiographic response assessment. The primary outcomes of interest were the progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events were also recorded. In the ICI rechallenge and non-ICI rechallenge groups, the objective response rate (ORR) was 15.4% and 11.8%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.6% and 44.1% (<i>P</i> = .011). Compared with the non-ICI rechallenge group, median PFS2 in the ICI rechallenge group was significantly prolonged (5.63 <i>vs</i>. 3.03 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.73; <i>P</i> = .001), while there was no statistically significant difference in median OS (12.33 <i>vs</i>. 7.10 months, HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.27; <i>P</i> = .344). ICI rechallenge therapy and radiotherapy administered during second-line treatment were recognized as independent predictive factors influencing PFS2. These findings suggest that second-line ICI rechallenge is tolerable and could benefit a subset of patients with advanced ESCC.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 21(1)
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.