Bayesian Regularization for Dynamical System Identification: Additive Noise Models

Consider the dynamical system ẋ = ƒ (x), where x ∈ Rⁿ is the state vector, ẋ is the time or spatial derivative, and ƒ is the system model. We wish to identify unknown ƒ from its time-series or spatial data. For this, we propose a Bayesian framework based on the maximum a posteriori (MAP) point estimate, to give a generalized Tikhonov regularization method with the residual and regularization terms identified, respectively, with the negative logarithms of the likelihood and prior distributions. As well as estimates of the model coefficients, the Bayesian interpretation provides access to the full Bayesian apparatus, including the ranking of models, the quantification of model uncertainties, and the estimation of unknown (nuisance) hyperparameters. For multivariate Gaussian likelihood and prior distributions, the Bayesian formulation gives a Gaussian posterior distribution, in which the numerator contains a Mahalanobis distance or “Gaussian norm”. In this study, two Bayesian algorithms for the estimation of hyperparameters—the joint maximum a posteriori (JMAP) and variational Bayesian approximation (VBA)—are compared to the popular SINDy, LASSO, and ridge regression algorithms for the analysis of several dynamical systems with additive noise. We consider two dynamical systems, the Lorenz convection system and the Shil’nikov cubic system, with four choices of noise model: symmetric Gaussian or Laplace noise and skewed Rayleigh or Erlang noise, with different magnitudes. The posterior Gaussian norm is found to provide a robust metric for quantitative model selection—with quantification of the model uncertainties—across all dynamical systems and noise models examined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2025012017
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Regularization for Dynamical System Identification: Additive Noise Models

Markus Quade, Robert K. Niven, Ali Mohammad‐Djafari, Laurent Cordier et al.
Control Systems and Identification
article

Bayesian Regularization for Dynamical System Identification: Additive Noise Models

Markus Quade, Robert K. Niven, Ali Mohammad‐Djafari, Laurent Cordier, Markus Abel
article en

Abstract

Consider the dynamical system ẋ = ƒ (x), where x ∈ Rⁿ is the state vector, ẋ is the time or spatial derivative, and ƒ is the system model. We wish to identify unknown ƒ from its time-series or spatial data. For this, we propose a Bayesian framework based on the maximum a posteriori (MAP) point estimate, to give a generalized Tikhonov regularization method with the residual and regularization terms identified, respectively, with the negative logarithms of the likelihood and prior distributions. As well as estimates of the model coefficients, the Bayesian interpretation provides access to the full Bayesian apparatus, including the ranking of models, the quantification of model uncertainties, and the estimation of unknown (nuisance) hyperparameters. For multivariate Gaussian likelihood and prior distributions, the Bayesian formulation gives a Gaussian posterior distribution, in which the numerator contains a Mahalanobis distance or “Gaussian norm”. In this study, two Bayesian algorithms for the estimation of hyperparameters—the joint maximum a posteriori (JMAP) and variational Bayesian approximation (VBA)—are compared to the popular SINDy, LASSO, and ridge regression algorithms for the analysis of several dynamical systems with additive noise. We consider two dynamical systems, the Lorenz convection system and the Shil’nikov cubic system, with four choices of noise model: symmetric Gaussian or Laplace noise and skewed Rayleigh or Erlang noise, with different magnitudes. The posterior Gaussian norm is found to provide a robust metric for quantitative model selection—with quantification of the model uncertainties—across all dynamical systems and noise models examined.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Canberra (AU), Institut Pprime (FR), UNSW Sydney (AU), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Laboratoire des signaux et systèmes (FR), CentraleSupélec (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Control Systems and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.