The Effect of “Plus” Services in Microfinance: A Doubly Robust Machine Learning Approach

Abstract Microfinance institutions (MFIs) expand financial inclusion by providing credit and savings services to low-income households excluded from formal finance. Because the poor face multiple needs, many MFIs offer “plus” services—either financial (e.g., insurance, remittances) or nonfinancial (e.g., education, business training, health promotion, gender empowerment). We use a doubly robust, random-forest–based approach to obtain semiparametrically efficient estimates of the average treatment effect (ATE), estimating the ATE of each plus service on both outreach (social mission) and financial performance, while accounting for heterogeneity in MFI characteristics and operating environments. The results show that nonfinancial plus services enable MFIs to both deepen and broaden outreach. By contrast, MFIs that add only financial plus products serve fewer and less-poor clients, consistent with mission drift. The policy implications are that, to advance financial inclusion, stakeholders should prioritize nonfinancial ‘plus’ services and be cautious about promoting only bank-like financial products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Services Research
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-025-00456-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of “Plus” Services in Microfinance: A Doubly Robust Machine Learning Approach

Valentina Hartarska, Robin C. Sickles, Kerda Varaku
1 citations
Journal of Financial Services Research
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

The Effect of “Plus” Services in Microfinance: A Doubly Robust Machine Learning Approach

Valentina Hartarska, Robin C. Sickles, Kerda Varaku
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Microfinance institutions (MFIs) expand financial inclusion by providing credit and savings services to low-income households excluded from formal finance. Because the poor face multiple needs, many MFIs offer “plus” services—either financial (e.g., insurance, remittances) or nonfinancial (e.g., education, business training, health promotion, gender empowerment). We use a doubly robust, random-forest–based approach to obtain semiparametrically efficient estimates of the average treatment effect (ATE), estimating the ATE of each plus service on both outreach (social mission) and financial performance, while accounting for heterogeneity in MFI characteristics and operating environments. The results show that nonfinancial plus services enable MFIs to both deepen and broaden outreach. By contrast, MFIs that add only financial plus products serve fewer and less-poor clients, consistent with mission drift. The policy implications are that, to advance financial inclusion, stakeholders should prioritize nonfinancial ‘plus’ services and be cautious about promoting only bank-like financial products.

Journal of Financial Services Research
Rice University (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of “Plus” Services in Microfinance: A Doubly Robust Machine Learning Approach — Valentina Hartarska, Robin C. Sickles, et al. · Journal of Financial Services Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS