Analytic Hierarchy Process–Based Evaluation and Experimental Assessment of the Optimal Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Geometry for Seismic Applications

Interlocking Compressed Earth Blocks (ICEBs) offer a sustainable alternative to conventional fired-clay bricks but remain hindered by inconsistent geometric designs and limited standardization. This study develops a stakeholder-weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to evaluate and select the most suitable ICEB geometry for sustainable and seismic-ready construction in developing regions. Five evaluation criteria—size, weight, interlocking effectiveness, reinforcement/grout provision, and handling ergonomics—were prioritized based on expert input from masons, engineers, architects, and researchers. The synthesized results ranked the HiLo-Tec-type geometry highest, followed by Thai-Rhino, Auram, and Hydraform designs. Unit weight (0.289) and reinforcement capacity (0.261) emerged as dominant decision factors. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of rankings under varying weight perturbations. The AHP framework identifies the top-ranked geometry, whose structural performance was examined experimentally through a full-scale cyclic test on a grouted double-wythe ICEB wall, revealing enhanced ductility and residual strength compared with traditional brick masonry. The proposed framework demonstrates that selected ICEB geometry can balance ergonomic and structural performance while meeting seismic resilience demands. Beyond geometry selection, the model provides a replicable decision-support tool adaptable for regional material innovations in sustainable construction.