Endorsement of the Neurodiversity Framework and Self-Esteem Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults

Background:Many autistic individuals struggle with poor mental health and low self-esteem, in part, due to internalized stigma. Given the strengths-based perspective of the neurodiversity framework, it is likely that endorsing it or its subcomponents could serve as a protective factor against poor mental health and low self-esteem among autistic individuals. Methods:The present study sought to investigate (1) the relationship between endorsement of the neurodiversity framework and self-esteem and (2) whether this relationship differed between autistic and non-autistic adults. A diverse sample of 123 autistic adults and 104 non-autistic adults living in the United States completed an online survey. Results:Autistic participants reported having significantly lower self-esteem compared with non-autistic participants. We conducted linear regressions, with aspects of the neurodiversity framework as predictor variables, autism status as the moderator, self-esteem as the criterion variable, and demographic differences between autistic and non-autistic samples as control variables. There was a significant interaction between autism status and the Autism as Difference subscale of the neurodiversity framework in predicting self-esteem. In particular, endorsing this facet of the neurodiversity framework was associated with significantly higher self-esteem for autistic participants compared with autistic individuals who endorsed low levels of this facet. However, there was no difference in self-esteem for non-autistic participants who endorsed different levels of the Autism as Difference subscale. Conclusion:Although autistic participants indicate worse self-esteem than non-autistic participants, endorsing aspects of the neurodiversity framework may have a buffering effect on this relationship by mitigating aspects of internalized stigma. Further work must be conducted to elucidate causal relations, but the present study sets a foundation for improving mental health in autistic adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581251398955
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endorsement of the Neurodiversity Framework and Self-Esteem Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults

Rachel A. VanDaalen, Sarah Y. Liu
Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Endorsement of the Neurodiversity Framework and Self-Esteem Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults

Rachel A. VanDaalen, Sarah Y. Liu
article en

Abstract

Background:Many autistic individuals struggle with poor mental health and low self-esteem, in part, due to internalized stigma. Given the strengths-based perspective of the neurodiversity framework, it is likely that endorsing it or its subcomponents could serve as a protective factor against poor mental health and low self-esteem among autistic individuals. Methods:The present study sought to investigate (1) the relationship between endorsement of the neurodiversity framework and self-esteem and (2) whether this relationship differed between autistic and non-autistic adults. A diverse sample of 123 autistic adults and 104 non-autistic adults living in the United States completed an online survey. Results:Autistic participants reported having significantly lower self-esteem compared with non-autistic participants. We conducted linear regressions, with aspects of the neurodiversity framework as predictor variables, autism status as the moderator, self-esteem as the criterion variable, and demographic differences between autistic and non-autistic samples as control variables. There was a significant interaction between autism status and the Autism as Difference subscale of the neurodiversity framework in predicting self-esteem. In particular, endorsing this facet of the neurodiversity framework was associated with significantly higher self-esteem for autistic participants compared with autistic individuals who endorsed low levels of this facet. However, there was no difference in self-esteem for non-autistic participants who endorsed different levels of the Autism as Difference subscale. Conclusion:Although autistic participants indicate worse self-esteem than non-autistic participants, endorsing aspects of the neurodiversity framework may have a buffering effect on this relationship by mitigating aspects of internalized stigma. Further work must be conducted to elucidate causal relations, but the present study sets a foundation for improving mental health in autistic adults.

Autism in Adulthood
Warneford Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Bath (GB), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.