Sustaining Unsustainability: The Legitimation Paradox of Unsustainable Companies

Companies with inherently unsustainable business models and high public salience face a paradox, as they need to construct themselves as desirable and appropriate organizations to maintain their license to operate, while at the same time profiting from practices that are fundamentally unsustainable. This paper advances our understanding of legitimation under paradoxical conditions by examining how a highly visible and inherently unsustainable company legitimizes its unsustainability. Based on a micro-level analysis of corporate sustainability reports, press releases, and company quotes in news articles, we identify both traditional legitimation strategies and paradoxical legitimation strategies, the latter of which conflict with other legitimation strategies through tensions related to boundaries, agency, and temporality. Our findings show how paradoxical legitimation strategies enable companies to sustain their unsustainability by engaging in an ongoing oscillation between claiming sustainability and defending unsustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization & Environment
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266251389784
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustaining Unsustainability: The Legitimation Paradox of Unsustainable Companies

Irene Pollach, Christiane Marie Høvring, Christa Thomsen, Anne Ellerup Nielsen
1 citations
Organization & Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Sustaining Unsustainability: The Legitimation Paradox of Unsustainable Companies

Irene Pollach, Christiane Marie Høvring, Christa Thomsen, Anne Ellerup Nielsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Companies with inherently unsustainable business models and high public salience face a paradox, as they need to construct themselves as desirable and appropriate organizations to maintain their license to operate, while at the same time profiting from practices that are fundamentally unsustainable. This paper advances our understanding of legitimation under paradoxical conditions by examining how a highly visible and inherently unsustainable company legitimizes its unsustainability. Based on a micro-level analysis of corporate sustainability reports, press releases, and company quotes in news articles, we identify both traditional legitimation strategies and paradoxical legitimation strategies, the latter of which conflict with other legitimation strategies through tensions related to boundaries, agency, and temporality. Our findings show how paradoxical legitimation strategies enable companies to sustain their unsustainability by engaging in an ongoing oscillation between claiming sustainability and defending unsustainability.

Organization & Environment
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.