Size Does Not Matter: Numeracy and the Effect of Quantity Information on Consumers' Price Judgments

ABSTRACT A product's printed quantity information (e.g., 12 oz) is thought to provide meaningful information for product evaluations. However, previous research suggests that consumers often do not weigh this information. It remains unclear whether some people, in fact, do weigh the information and what factors (e.g., package design) might increase or decrease such a consideration. In one lab experiment and one eye‐tracking experiment, we examined the influence of individual differences in objective numeric abilities on the perception and use of quantity information. In both experiments, participants indicated willingness‐to‐pay judgments for consumer goods (e.g., chocolate and cereals) that varied in their quantity (e.g., 100 vs. 200 g). In each case, we observed an interaction between objective numeracy and quantity on willingness‐to‐pay judgments. More numerate individuals were more likely to look at quantity information and to use this information in their willingness‐to‐pay judgments, whereas people with lower numeracy often did not differentiate between quantities. Variations in package design did not change this effect, but the presence of additional quantity indicators increased the use of the original quantity information for people who were more and less numerate. Implications for consumer protection are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70051
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size Does Not Matter: Numeracy and the Effect of Quantity Information on Consumers' Price Judgments

Arnd Florack, Ellen Peters, Janet Kleber
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Size Does Not Matter: Numeracy and the Effect of Quantity Information on Consumers' Price Judgments

Arnd Florack, Ellen Peters, Janet Kleber
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A product's printed quantity information (e.g., 12 oz) is thought to provide meaningful information for product evaluations. However, previous research suggests that consumers often do not weigh this information. It remains unclear whether some people, in fact, do weigh the information and what factors (e.g., package design) might increase or decrease such a consideration. In one lab experiment and one eye‐tracking experiment, we examined the influence of individual differences in objective numeric abilities on the perception and use of quantity information. In both experiments, participants indicated willingness‐to‐pay judgments for consumer goods (e.g., chocolate and cereals) that varied in their quantity (e.g., 100 vs. 200 g). In each case, we observed an interaction between objective numeracy and quantity on willingness‐to‐pay judgments. More numerate individuals were more likely to look at quantity information and to use this information in their willingness‐to‐pay judgments, whereas people with lower numeracy often did not differentiate between quantities. Variations in package design did not change this effect, but the presence of additional quantity indicators increased the use of the original quantity information for people who were more and less numerate. Implications for consumer protection are discussed.

Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingVol. 38(5)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Oregon (US), University of Klagenfurt (AT)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.