Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and BioRoot flow: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study

This in vitro study aimed to compare the dentinal tubule penetration of a conventional epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) and two bioceramic-based sealers (MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow). Thirty extracted human single-rooted premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10): AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and BioRoot Flow. Root canals were instrumented using the ProTaper Universal rotary file system. Sealers were labeled with 0.1% Rhodamine Bprior to obturated with the single-cone technique. Roots sectioned at coronal, middle, and apical levels into 1 mm thick slices. The sealer penetration area (mm²) and maximum penetration depth (mm) were analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests (p < 0.05). AH Plus demonstrated statistically significantly lower penetration in both penetration area and maximum penetration depth compared to both MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow (p < 0.05). Among the bioceramic-based sealers, MTA Fillapex exhibited the highest penetration values in the coronal and middle regions. Furthermore, a pronounced decrease in both penetration area and depth was observed from the coronal to the apical regions in all groups (p < 0.05). MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow exhibit a superior performance in the coronal and middle regions compared to AH Plus. While the differences in the apical region were less distinct, a consistent decrease in penetration values from coronal to apical was observed across all materials. These findings indicate that material composition and root canal region play critical roles in dentinal tubule penetration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07412-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and BioRoot flow: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study

İsmail Uzun, Emre Çulha, Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, Samet Tosun et al.
1 citations
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
article

Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and BioRoot flow: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study

İsmail Uzun, Emre Çulha, Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, Samet Tosun, Oğuz Burhan Çetinkaya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to compare the dentinal tubule penetration of a conventional epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) and two bioceramic-based sealers (MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow). Thirty extracted human single-rooted premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10): AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and BioRoot Flow. Root canals were instrumented using the ProTaper Universal rotary file system. Sealers were labeled with 0.1% Rhodamine Bprior to obturated with the single-cone technique. Roots sectioned at coronal, middle, and apical levels into 1 mm thick slices. The sealer penetration area (mm²) and maximum penetration depth (mm) were analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests (p < 0.05). AH Plus demonstrated statistically significantly lower penetration in both penetration area and maximum penetration depth compared to both MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow (p < 0.05). Among the bioceramic-based sealers, MTA Fillapex exhibited the highest penetration values in the coronal and middle regions. Furthermore, a pronounced decrease in both penetration area and depth was observed from the coronal to the apical regions in all groups (p < 0.05). MTA Fillapex and BioRoot Flow exhibit a superior performance in the coronal and middle regions compared to AH Plus. While the differences in the apical region were less distinct, a consistent decrease in penetration values from coronal to apical was observed across all materials. These findings indicate that material composition and root canal region play critical roles in dentinal tubule penetration.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 25(1)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR), Pamukkale University (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.