Sinn und Miteinandersein – ein Dialog zwischen Emmanuel Levinas und Eugen Fink

There is nearly no reference directly addressed from Emmanuel Levinas to Eugen Fink and vice versa (apart from Levinas’ verdict directed to Fink’s concept of play as example for the unethical consequences growing out of a phenomenology still oriented towards an ontological source). Yet, both of them challenged their phenomenological grounds, which might beg for a comparison on methodological grounds. However, what I am interested in, is to start a virtual dialogue between these two protagonists on a field, we might only discover today as Fink’s phenomenology of social relations is accessible once again to readers, after Fink himself had mostly developed it in oral lecture courses. Such a virtual dialogue might establish a ground for moving forth with phenomenological inquiry to what we could be able to conceptualize from the heritage of phenomenological thinking, whenever we understand Phenomenology itself as dialogical. Concepts of world, its relationality and its boundaries on the one hand, concepts of transcendence and infinity on the other hand, are examples for a field where Fink and Levinas might meet and get into a dialogue about our social relations, their ontological, anthropological and ethical implications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC INTERPRETATIONES
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/24646504.2025.11
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sinn und Miteinandersein – ein Dialog zwischen Emmanuel Levinas und Eugen Fink

Annette Hilt
AUC INTERPRETATIONES
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Sinn und Miteinandersein – ein Dialog zwischen Emmanuel Levinas und Eugen Fink

Annette Hilt
article en

Abstract

There is nearly no reference directly addressed from Emmanuel Levinas to Eugen Fink and vice versa (apart from Levinas’ verdict directed to Fink’s concept of play as example for the unethical consequences growing out of a phenomenology still oriented towards an ontological source). Yet, both of them challenged their phenomenological grounds, which might beg for a comparison on methodological grounds. However, what I am interested in, is to start a virtual dialogue between these two protagonists on a field, we might only discover today as Fink’s phenomenology of social relations is accessible once again to readers, after Fink himself had mostly developed it in oral lecture courses. Such a virtual dialogue might establish a ground for moving forth with phenomenological inquiry to what we could be able to conceptualize from the heritage of phenomenological thinking, whenever we understand Phenomenology itself as dialogical. Concepts of world, its relationality and its boundaries on the one hand, concepts of transcendence and infinity on the other hand, are examples for a field where Fink and Levinas might meet and get into a dialogue about our social relations, their ontological, anthropological and ethical implications.

AUC INTERPRETATIONESVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sinn und Miteinandersein – ein Dialog zwischen Emmanuel Levinas und Eugen Fink — Annette Hilt · AUC INTERPRETATIONES (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS