Environmental Performance Drivers: A Political Cost Approach

ABSTRACT We contribute to the business strategy and the environment literature by examining the effect of political cost pressures on corporate environmental performance in the context of United Kingdom‐listed firms. Drawing on a sample of non‐financial firms from the FTSE All‐Share Index over a period of 10 years (2013–2022), we construct novel indices of political cost pressures, regulatory compliance, penalties and fines, strategic and risk management and market/social expectations, using textual analysis of annual reports. Employing firm fixed effects and two‐stage least squares (2SLS) models, we find that political cost pressures are significantly associated with lower carbon emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2), with the strongest effects observed for regulatory and penalty‐related disclosures. The results persist over time when lead variables are used, supporting the temporal validity of the relationships. Overall, our findings advance the political cost hypothesis by demonstrating that mandatory disclosure and external scrutiny prompt firms to enhance their actual environmental performance, thereby reinforcing institutional and stakeholder accountability mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70372
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Performance Drivers: A Political Cost Approach

Kazi Abul Bashar Muhammad Afzal Hossain, Mahmoud Elmarzouky, George Giannopoulos
1 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Environmental Performance Drivers: A Political Cost Approach

Kazi Abul Bashar Muhammad Afzal Hossain, Mahmoud Elmarzouky, George Giannopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We contribute to the business strategy and the environment literature by examining the effect of political cost pressures on corporate environmental performance in the context of United Kingdom‐listed firms. Drawing on a sample of non‐financial firms from the FTSE All‐Share Index over a period of 10 years (2013–2022), we construct novel indices of political cost pressures, regulatory compliance, penalties and fines, strategic and risk management and market/social expectations, using textual analysis of annual reports. Employing firm fixed effects and two‐stage least squares (2SLS) models, we find that political cost pressures are significantly associated with lower carbon emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2), with the strongest effects observed for regulatory and penalty‐related disclosures. The results persist over time when lead variables are used, supporting the temporal validity of the relationships. Overall, our findings advance the political cost hypothesis by demonstrating that mandatory disclosure and external scrutiny prompt firms to enhance their actual environmental performance, thereby reinforcing institutional and stakeholder accountability mechanisms.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 35(3)
University of St Andrews (GB), Kingston University London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.