Richir liest Fink. Aporetik, Architektonik, Sprache

Marc Richir’s engagement with Eugen Fink’s Sixth Cartesian Meditation reveals a shared methodological concern with the limits of transcendental phenomenology. Both thinkers critique Husserl’s reduction for failing to adequately account for the distinction between mundane and transcendental attitude. Fink’s notion of a reduction of the sense of being closely parallels Richir’s hyperbolic epoché, both aiming to displace phenomenology’s ontological commitments in favor of a focus on its performance. A key point of divergence arises in their treatment of language. While Fink develops an architectonic model that attempts to sustain phenomenology’s methodological purity through systematic differentiation, Richir argues that this approach implicitly reinstates eidetico-logical presuppositions. He replaces Fink’s transcendental spectator with the concept of performing language, shifting the focus from theoretical predication to the dynamic constitution of sense formation. This study examines how Richir critically engages with Fink’s project, demonstrating that their differences are not oppositional but constitute a methodological reconfiguration of phenomenology’s scope and foundations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC INTERPRETATIONES
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/24646504.2025.5
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Richir liest Fink. Aporetik, Architektonik, Sprache

Philip Flock
AUC INTERPRETATIONES
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Richir liest Fink. Aporetik, Architektonik, Sprache

Philip Flock
article en

Abstract

Marc Richir’s engagement with Eugen Fink’s Sixth Cartesian Meditation reveals a shared methodological concern with the limits of transcendental phenomenology. Both thinkers critique Husserl’s reduction for failing to adequately account for the distinction between mundane and transcendental attitude. Fink’s notion of a reduction of the sense of being closely parallels Richir’s hyperbolic epoché, both aiming to displace phenomenology’s ontological commitments in favor of a focus on its performance. A key point of divergence arises in their treatment of language. While Fink develops an architectonic model that attempts to sustain phenomenology’s methodological purity through systematic differentiation, Richir argues that this approach implicitly reinstates eidetico-logical presuppositions. He replaces Fink’s transcendental spectator with the concept of performing language, shifting the focus from theoretical predication to the dynamic constitution of sense formation. This study examines how Richir critically engages with Fink’s project, demonstrating that their differences are not oppositional but constitute a methodological reconfiguration of phenomenology’s scope and foundations.

AUC INTERPRETATIONESVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Richir liest Fink. Aporetik, Architektonik, Sprache — Philip Flock · AUC INTERPRETATIONES (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS