The relationships between stress, physical activity, mood, cognitive-emotional abilities, personality traits, and sleep

Sleep quality and duration are shaped by a complex interplay of behavioral, psychological, and sociodemographic factors. This study aimed to examine the relationships between physical activity, perceived stress, mood, personality traits, and cognitive- emotional abilities in relation to adult sleep patterns. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,140 participants (27.1% men, 72.9% women; aged 18–64). Sleep parameters were assessed using items adapted from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Additional validated tools measured physical activity (IPAQ), perceived stress (PSS-10), mood (BRUMS), emotional intelligence (SSREIT), personality traits (BFI), moral decision-making, and cognitive reflection. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, two-way ANOVAs, and multi-step general linear modeling. Women reported higher levels of perceived stress, fatigue, emotional intelligence, and empathetic decision-making, while men showed greater vigor, BMI, and leisure-time physical activity. No significant gender differences were found in sleep duration or latency, although men tended to go to bed later. Sleep outcomes were most strongly influenced by demographic factors, including age, gender, place of residence, education, and physical job demands. Psychological variables, including fatigue, anger, and vigor, also played a significant role. Additionally, personality traits like neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness, along with body mass index, perceived health, and leisure-time physical activity, were important predictors of sleep quality. Conversely, other expected psychosocial factors—such as happiness, perceived stress, sedentary behavior, emotional intelligence, depression, confusion, and work-related moderate to vigorous physical activity—were not found to be significant. Our findings indicate that sleep indicators are related to various sociodemographic factors, personality traits, overall health, mood profiles, and notably, physical activity during leisure time. However, we did not find any significant connections between sleep indicators and cognitive-emotional abilities, such as emotional intelligence, cognitive reflection, and empathy. Trial registration

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07567-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationships between stress, physical activity, mood, cognitive-emotional abilities, personality traits, and sleep

Daiva Majauskienė, Aušra Lisinskienė, Neringa Baranauskienė, Albertas Skurvydas et al.
1 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Sleep and related disorders
2.12
article

The relationships between stress, physical activity, mood, cognitive-emotional abilities, personality traits, and sleep

Daiva Majauskienė, Aušra Lisinskienė, Neringa Baranauskienė, Albertas Skurvydas, Asta Šarkauskienė, Ramune Dirvanskiene, Dovilė Valančienė, Daiva Mockevičienė, Agnė Predkelienė
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sleep quality and duration are shaped by a complex interplay of behavioral, psychological, and sociodemographic factors. This study aimed to examine the relationships between physical activity, perceived stress, mood, personality traits, and cognitive- emotional abilities in relation to adult sleep patterns. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,140 participants (27.1% men, 72.9% women; aged 18–64). Sleep parameters were assessed using items adapted from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Additional validated tools measured physical activity (IPAQ), perceived stress (PSS-10), mood (BRUMS), emotional intelligence (SSREIT), personality traits (BFI), moral decision-making, and cognitive reflection. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, two-way ANOVAs, and multi-step general linear modeling. Women reported higher levels of perceived stress, fatigue, emotional intelligence, and empathetic decision-making, while men showed greater vigor, BMI, and leisure-time physical activity. No significant gender differences were found in sleep duration or latency, although men tended to go to bed later. Sleep outcomes were most strongly influenced by demographic factors, including age, gender, place of residence, education, and physical job demands. Psychological variables, including fatigue, anger, and vigor, also played a significant role. Additionally, personality traits like neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness, along with body mass index, perceived health, and leisure-time physical activity, were important predictors of sleep quality. Conversely, other expected psychosocial factors—such as happiness, perceived stress, sedentary behavior, emotional intelligence, depression, confusion, and work-related moderate to vigorous physical activity—were not found to be significant. Our findings indicate that sleep indicators are related to various sociodemographic factors, personality traits, overall health, mood profiles, and notably, physical activity during leisure time. However, we did not find any significant connections between sleep indicators and cognitive-emotional abilities, such as emotional intelligence, cognitive reflection, and empathy. Trial registration

BMC PsychiatryVol. 25(1)
Vilnius University (LT), Vytautas Magnus University (LT), Klaipėda University (LT), Vilnius University of Applied Sciences (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sleep and related disorders
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.