ClimLoco1.0: CLimate variable confidence Interval of Multivariate Linear Observational COnstraint

Abstract. Projections of future climate are key to society's adaptation and mitigation plans in response to climate change. Numerical climate models provide projections, but the large dispersion between them makes future climate very uncertain. To refine them, approaches called observational constraints (OCs) have been developed. They constrain an ensemble of climate projections using some real-world observations. However, there are many difficulties in dealing with the large literature on OC: the methods are diverse, the mathematical formulation and underlying assumptions are not always clear, and the methods are often limited to the use of the observations of only one variable. To address these challenges, this article proposes a new statistical model called ClimLoco1.0, which stands for “CLimate variable confidence Interval of Multivariate Linear Observational COnstraint”. It describes, in a rigorous way, the confidence interval of a projected variable (its best guess associated with an uncertainty at a confidence level) obtained using a multivariate linear OC. The article is built up in increasing complexity by expressing three different cases – the last one being ClimLoco1.0, the confidence interval of a projected variable: unconstrained, constrained by multiple real-world observations assumed to be noiseless, and constrained by multiple real-world observations assumed to be noisy. ClimLoco1.0 thus accounts for observational noise (instrumental error and climate-internal variability), which is sometimes neglected in the literature but is important as it reduces the impact of the OC. Furthermore, ClimLoco1.0 accounts for uncertainty rigorously by taking into account the quality of the estimators, which depends, for example, on the number of climate models considered. In addition to providing an interpretation of the mathematical results, this article proposes graphical interpretations based on synthetic data. ClimLoco1.0 is compared to some methods from the literature at the end of the article and is used in a real case study in the appendix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9015-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ClimLoco1.0: CLimate variable confidence Interval of Multivariate Linear Observational COnstraint

Didier Swingedouw, Marie Chavent, Valentin Portmann
1 citations
Geoscientific model development
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

ClimLoco1.0: CLimate variable confidence Interval of Multivariate Linear Observational COnstraint

Didier Swingedouw, Marie Chavent, Valentin Portmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Projections of future climate are key to society's adaptation and mitigation plans in response to climate change. Numerical climate models provide projections, but the large dispersion between them makes future climate very uncertain. To refine them, approaches called observational constraints (OCs) have been developed. They constrain an ensemble of climate projections using some real-world observations. However, there are many difficulties in dealing with the large literature on OC: the methods are diverse, the mathematical formulation and underlying assumptions are not always clear, and the methods are often limited to the use of the observations of only one variable. To address these challenges, this article proposes a new statistical model called ClimLoco1.0, which stands for “CLimate variable confidence Interval of Multivariate Linear Observational COnstraint”. It describes, in a rigorous way, the confidence interval of a projected variable (its best guess associated with an uncertainty at a confidence level) obtained using a multivariate linear OC. The article is built up in increasing complexity by expressing three different cases – the last one being ClimLoco1.0, the confidence interval of a projected variable: unconstrained, constrained by multiple real-world observations assumed to be noiseless, and constrained by multiple real-world observations assumed to be noisy. ClimLoco1.0 thus accounts for observational noise (instrumental error and climate-internal variability), which is sometimes neglected in the literature but is important as it reduces the impact of the OC. Furthermore, ClimLoco1.0 accounts for uncertainty rigorously by taking into account the quality of the estimators, which depends, for example, on the number of climate models considered. In addition to providing an interpretation of the mathematical results, this article proposes graphical interpretations based on synthetic data. ClimLoco1.0 is compared to some methods from the literature at the end of the article and is used in a real case study in the appendix.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(22)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux (FR)
Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA), European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.