Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, shows promise for sedation in endoscopic procedures. However, its cardiovascular effects during painless gastroscopy remain unclear. This study compared the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring. A total of 300 patients scheduled for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (Group R, n = 150) or the propofol group (Group P, n = 150). Group R received remimazolam tosilate (0.2 mg/kg), while Group P received propofol (2 mg/kg). Primary outcomes were mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO), recorded at two time points: the start (T1) and completion (T2) of the examination. Secondary outcomes included adverse events such as injection-related pain, hypotension, hypoxemia, respiratory depression, and bradycardia. At both assessment points, MAP was significantly higher in Group R than in Group P (82.5 vs. 75.0 mmHg at T1, p < 0.001; 82.0 vs. 77.0 mmHg at T2, p = 0.002). Additionally, CO was significantly higher in Group R (5.7 vs. 5.4 L/min, p = 0.017). The incidence of adverse events was greater in Group P compared to Group R, including injection pain (25.3% vs. 6.7%), hypotension (24.7% vs. 5.3%), hypoxia (5.3% vs. 0%), and bradycardia (14.7% vs. 0%). Both remimazolam and propofol provide effective sedation for painless gastroscopy. However, remimazolam offers superior hemodynamic stability and significantly fewer adverse events. The study was subsequently documented in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2300068901; registration date: March 1, 2023). This single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind study compared the cardiovascular effects of remimazolam and propofol during painless gastroscopy. Our findings demonstrated that remimazolam provided superior hemodynamic stability compared to propofol, with significantly lower incidences of hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxia compared to propofol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03484-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Fengshan Gong, Qiangjun Gui, Lanhui Lan, Xueping Li et al.
3 citations
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
6.57
article

Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during sedation for painless gastroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Fengshan Gong, Qiangjun Gui, Lanhui Lan, Xueping Li, Guanghong Zhou, Yujiao Wei, Q. G. Wen, Xianghua Cao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, shows promise for sedation in endoscopic procedures. However, its cardiovascular effects during painless gastroscopy remain unclear. This study compared the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy using continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring. A total of 300 patients scheduled for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (Group R, n = 150) or the propofol group (Group P, n = 150). Group R received remimazolam tosilate (0.2 mg/kg), while Group P received propofol (2 mg/kg). Primary outcomes were mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO), recorded at two time points: the start (T1) and completion (T2) of the examination. Secondary outcomes included adverse events such as injection-related pain, hypotension, hypoxemia, respiratory depression, and bradycardia. At both assessment points, MAP was significantly higher in Group R than in Group P (82.5 vs. 75.0 mmHg at T1, p < 0.001; 82.0 vs. 77.0 mmHg at T2, p = 0.002). Additionally, CO was significantly higher in Group R (5.7 vs. 5.4 L/min, p = 0.017). The incidence of adverse events was greater in Group P compared to Group R, including injection pain (25.3% vs. 6.7%), hypotension (24.7% vs. 5.3%), hypoxia (5.3% vs. 0%), and bradycardia (14.7% vs. 0%). Both remimazolam and propofol provide effective sedation for painless gastroscopy. However, remimazolam offers superior hemodynamic stability and significantly fewer adverse events. The study was subsequently documented in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2300068901; registration date: March 1, 2023). This single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind study compared the cardiovascular effects of remimazolam and propofol during painless gastroscopy. Our findings demonstrated that remimazolam provided superior hemodynamic stability compared to propofol, with significantly lower incidences of hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxia compared to propofol.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 25(1)
Dongguan University of Technology (CN), Tung Wah Hospital (CN), Dongguan People’s Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
6.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.