A multicenter observational retrospective study of second-line treatment with daratumumab–bortezomib–dexamethasone (DaraVd) in multiple myeloma patients refractory to lenalidomide

Upfront lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has become the gold standard. Nonetheless, proper management of lenalidomide-refractory patients is challenging. Daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DaraVd) has been approved after ≥ 1 prior therapy, but data on upfront lenalidomide refractoriness are scarce. We run a retrospective study to assess the outcomes of 85 lenalidomide-refractory patients treated at first relapse with DaraVd in 10 Italian centers. Baseline characteristics were representative of a general population, despite inferior median age (57 years). Sixteen (27%) at diagnosis and 7 (29%) at relapse had high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or del17). Furthermore, one had del1p, one gain1q (3 copies) and one amp1q (≥ 4 copies) at diagnosis; one gain1q and one amp1q at relapse. Overall response rate was 86% (61% ≥ VGPR). Median PFS and OS were 15 and 47 months, respectively (25-months median follow-up). Previous dose/duration of lenalidomide did not influence PFS, favorably affected by the absence of amp1q (p = 0.04), bone marrow plasma cells < 60% (p = 0.003), absence of extramedullary-disease (p = 0.009), and ≥ VGPR (p < 0.001) or ≥ CR (p = 0.012). In a multivariate model, response ≥ VGPR was confirmed to be independently associated to PFS (median: 26 vs. 7 months). At least one grade ≥ 2 adverse event (AE) occurred in 67 (85%) patients. Most common AEs were hematological (72%), infections (30%, 8% grade-3, 1% grade-5), pneumonia (14%), and asthenia (38%). Peripheral neuropathy rate was 58% (8% grade-3). Toxicity-related bortezomib dose reduction occurred in 39 (49.4%) patients; 27 (44%) delayed Dara (1 median dose), mostly for infections. Three patients discontinued for toxicity. Collectively, second-line DaraVd remains an alternative in lenalidomide-refractory patients, especially for those ineligible for pomalidomide/carfilzomib-based regimens, T-cell-redirecting therapies or other experimental drugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01956-w
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multicenter observational retrospective study of second-line treatment with daratumumab–bortezomib–dexamethasone (DaraVd) in multiple myeloma patients refractory to lenalidomide

Franca Bigi, Marisa Talarico, Giuseppe Mele, Massimo Gentile et al.
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

A multicenter observational retrospective study of second-line treatment with daratumumab–bortezomib–dexamethasone (DaraVd) in multiple myeloma patients refractory to lenalidomide

Franca Bigi, Marisa Talarico, Giuseppe Mele, Massimo Gentile, Micol Quaresima, Lucia Pantani, Enrica Manzato, Vincenza Solli, Lorenzo Cani, Katia Mancuso, Paola Tacchetti, Ilaria Rizzello, Elena Zamagni, Renato Zambello, Gregorio Barilà, Michèle Cavo, Simona Barbato, Angelo Belotti, Nicola Sgherza, Stefano Ghibellini, Ilaria Sacchetti, P. Stefanoni, Roberta Restuccia, S Masci, Melania Celli, Michele Puppi
article en

Abstract

Upfront lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has become the gold standard. Nonetheless, proper management of lenalidomide-refractory patients is challenging. Daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DaraVd) has been approved after ≥ 1 prior therapy, but data on upfront lenalidomide refractoriness are scarce. We run a retrospective study to assess the outcomes of 85 lenalidomide-refractory patients treated at first relapse with DaraVd in 10 Italian centers. Baseline characteristics were representative of a general population, despite inferior median age (57 years). Sixteen (27%) at diagnosis and 7 (29%) at relapse had high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or del17). Furthermore, one had del1p, one gain1q (3 copies) and one amp1q (≥ 4 copies) at diagnosis; one gain1q and one amp1q at relapse. Overall response rate was 86% (61% ≥ VGPR). Median PFS and OS were 15 and 47 months, respectively (25-months median follow-up). Previous dose/duration of lenalidomide did not influence PFS, favorably affected by the absence of amp1q (p = 0.04), bone marrow plasma cells < 60% (p = 0.003), absence of extramedullary-disease (p = 0.009), and ≥ VGPR (p < 0.001) or ≥ CR (p = 0.012). In a multivariate model, response ≥ VGPR was confirmed to be independently associated to PFS (median: 26 vs. 7 months). At least one grade ≥ 2 adverse event (AE) occurred in 67 (85%) patients. Most common AEs were hematological (72%), infections (30%, 8% grade-3, 1% grade-5), pneumonia (14%), and asthenia (38%). Peripheral neuropathy rate was 58% (8% grade-3). Toxicity-related bortezomib dose reduction occurred in 39 (49.4%) patients; 27 (44%) delayed Dara (1 median dose), mostly for infections. Three patients discontinued for toxicity. Collectively, second-line DaraVd remains an alternative in lenalidomide-refractory patients, especially for those ineligible for pomalidomide/carfilzomib-based regimens, T-cell-redirecting therapies or other experimental drugs.

Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 26(1)
University of Padua (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Ospedale A. Perrino (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Istituto di Ematologia di Bologna (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT), Ospedale San Bortolo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (IT), University of Calabria (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.