Bridging the Gap in Chemical Process Monitoring: Beyond Algorithm-Centric Research Toward Industrial Deployment

Over the past few decades, industrial process monitoring has been greatly advanced by machine learning and data analytics, with sophisticated models continuing to be developed and validated on benchmark processes such as the Tennessee Eastman simulation process. Yet, these models face significant barriers in real-world industrial deployment, as their increasing complexity leads to poor generalization, limited transparency, and difficulty in simultaneously achieving fault detection and root cause diagnosis, creating a persistent academia–industry gap. To address this challenge, this review systematically synthesizes three core categories of data-driven process monitoring methods (statistical, probabilistic, and deep learning-based approaches), delves into cutting-edge techniques tailored to mitigate the aforementioned practical constraints, and conducts an in-depth analysis of current obstacles hindering industrial application. Our analysis identifies a predominant algorithm-centric bias in current research, marked by overreliance on simulated benchmarks, insufficient model interpretability, and a misalignment with industrial requirements for lightweight and operable solutions. By integrating theoretical progress with industrial priorities, this study offers a cohesive roadmap for future research, establishing a foundation for developing more efficient, reliable, and secure chemical processes that bring practical utility to both academic and industrial practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123809
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Gap in Chemical Process Monitoring: Beyond Algorithm-Centric Research Toward Industrial Deployment

Fangyuan Ma, Jingde Wang, Wei Hua Sun, Cheng Ji et al.
Processes
Fault Detection and Control Systems
article

Bridging the Gap in Chemical Process Monitoring: Beyond Algorithm-Centric Research Toward Industrial Deployment

Fangyuan Ma, Jingde Wang, Wei Hua Sun, Cheng Ji, Jingzhi Rao
article en

Abstract

Over the past few decades, industrial process monitoring has been greatly advanced by machine learning and data analytics, with sophisticated models continuing to be developed and validated on benchmark processes such as the Tennessee Eastman simulation process. Yet, these models face significant barriers in real-world industrial deployment, as their increasing complexity leads to poor generalization, limited transparency, and difficulty in simultaneously achieving fault detection and root cause diagnosis, creating a persistent academia–industry gap. To address this challenge, this review systematically synthesizes three core categories of data-driven process monitoring methods (statistical, probabilistic, and deep learning-based approaches), delves into cutting-edge techniques tailored to mitigate the aforementioned practical constraints, and conducts an in-depth analysis of current obstacles hindering industrial application. Our analysis identifies a predominant algorithm-centric bias in current research, marked by overreliance on simulated benchmarks, insufficient model interpretability, and a misalignment with industrial requirements for lightweight and operable solutions. By integrating theoretical progress with industrial priorities, this study offers a cohesive roadmap for future research, establishing a foundation for developing more efficient, reliable, and secure chemical processes that bring practical utility to both academic and industrial practice.

ProcessesVol. 13(12)
Huaiyin Normal University (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.