Establishment Mode by Chinese MNEs and the Positive Direction of Institutional Distance

Past research suggests that institutional distance has asymmetric impacts on the decisions of multinational enterprises (MNEs) depending on the direction of the distance. A positive distance refers to an institutionally more developed host country, while a negative distance denotes an institutionally weaker target country. Building upon the directionality logic of institutional distance, this article investigates these asymmetric effects in the case of emerging market MNEs from China. More precisely, it analyses the influence of a positive direction of institutional distance on the choice between acquisitions and greenfield investments. It also addresses the moderating effect of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and state ownership. Drawing on a sample of 1,273 foreign direct investments by Chinese firms during 2013–2023, the findings suggest that Chinese MNEs are less likely to prefer acquisitions as positive institutional distance increases. Moreover, this negative association is lower in BRI countries and higher for state-owned enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Report
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455251392058
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment Mode by Chinese MNEs and the Positive Direction of Institutional Distance

Diego Quer
China Report
International Business and FDI
article

Establishment Mode by Chinese MNEs and the Positive Direction of Institutional Distance

Diego Quer
article en

Abstract

Past research suggests that institutional distance has asymmetric impacts on the decisions of multinational enterprises (MNEs) depending on the direction of the distance. A positive distance refers to an institutionally more developed host country, while a negative distance denotes an institutionally weaker target country. Building upon the directionality logic of institutional distance, this article investigates these asymmetric effects in the case of emerging market MNEs from China. More precisely, it analyses the influence of a positive direction of institutional distance on the choice between acquisitions and greenfield investments. It also addresses the moderating effect of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and state ownership. Drawing on a sample of 1,273 foreign direct investments by Chinese firms during 2013–2023, the findings suggest that Chinese MNEs are less likely to prefer acquisitions as positive institutional distance increases. Moreover, this negative association is lower in BRI countries and higher for state-owned enterprises.

China ReportVol. 62(1)
University of Alicante (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.