Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases–A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 268 Patients

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cancer is the second leading cause of death, and spinal metastases may occur in up to 40% of patients with cancer. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastases, and to identify risk factors that might shorten postoperative survival. <b>Methods</b>: Two-hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent surgery due to spinal metastases at a single center between 1990 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Various variables and prognostic scores were analyzed to assess their impact on postoperative survival. <b>Results</b>: Two-hundred thirty-three patients (86.9%) died with a mean time from surgery to death of 14.84 months. Twelve months postoperatively, the survival rate of the entire cohort was 41.8%. Patients who were 65 years or older and were bedbound or in a wheelchair had a significantly shorter survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Further risk factors for a worse survival rate were: higher preoperative ASA-score (β = 2.19, 95% CI 1.34-3.57; <i>p</i> = 0.002), higher age at the time of surgery (β = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.041), presence of preoperative additional extraspinal bone metastases (β = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-3.76; <i>p</i> = 0.047), ambulatory status (β = 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.4; <i>p</i> = 0.013), and elevated CRP-value > 5 mg/dL (β = 3.02, 95% CI 1.59-5.73; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Patients who are 65 years or older and bedbound or in a wheelchair had a significantly shorter survival period. When considering treatment options for patients with spinal metastases, a higher ASA-score, a higher age at the time of surgery, the presence of preoperative additional extraspinal bone metastases, being bedbound or in a wheelchair, and an elevated CRP-value > 5 mg/dL should be considered as significant risk factors for a worse survival rate. Available prognostic scores may only predict a patient's survival accurately in the short-term follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238308
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases–A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 268 Patients

Reinhard Windhager, Josef G. Grohs, Christoph Stihsen, P Krepler et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases–A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 268 Patients

Reinhard Windhager, Josef G. Grohs, Christoph Stihsen, P Krepler, Anna Rienmüller, Philipp T. Funovics, Bernhard Springer
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cancer is the second leading cause of death, and spinal metastases may occur in up to 40% of patients with cancer. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastases, and to identify risk factors that might shorten postoperative survival. <b>Methods</b>: Two-hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent surgery due to spinal metastases at a single center between 1990 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Various variables and prognostic scores were analyzed to assess their impact on postoperative survival. <b>Results</b>: Two-hundred thirty-three patients (86.9%) died with a mean time from surgery to death of 14.84 months. Twelve months postoperatively, the survival rate of the entire cohort was 41.8%. Patients who were 65 years or older and were bedbound or in a wheelchair had a significantly shorter survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Further risk factors for a worse survival rate were: higher preoperative ASA-score (β = 2.19, 95% CI 1.34-3.57; <i>p</i> = 0.002), higher age at the time of surgery (β = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.041), presence of preoperative additional extraspinal bone metastases (β = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-3.76; <i>p</i> = 0.047), ambulatory status (β = 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.4; <i>p</i> = 0.013), and elevated CRP-value > 5 mg/dL (β = 3.02, 95% CI 1.59-5.73; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Patients who are 65 years or older and bedbound or in a wheelchair had a significantly shorter survival period. When considering treatment options for patients with spinal metastases, a higher ASA-score, a higher age at the time of surgery, the presence of preoperative additional extraspinal bone metastases, being bedbound or in a wheelchair, and an elevated CRP-value > 5 mg/dL should be considered as significant risk factors for a worse survival rate. Available prognostic scores may only predict a patient's survival accurately in the short-term follow-up.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.