Chronic Disease Monitoring: Methodology for Classification Error and Self-Selection Bias Correction in Clinical Laboratory Data

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Chronic diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity and healthcare costs worldwide. Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent and costly chronic conditions in the United States, with a disproportionate burden in Puerto Rico. Surveillance of diabetes relies mainly on infrequent cohort studies and self-report surveys, which are limited in accuracy, segmentation, and timeliness. This study aimed to develop a generalizable methodology for monitoring chronic disease prevalence using routinely collected laboratory data, while correcting for systematic biases and diagnostic errors. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed more than five years of de-identified laboratory test results (2020-2024) from a large, island-wide network of clinical laboratories in Puerto Rico. To produce unbiased prevalence estimates, we applied a mathematical correction framework that accounted for two main sources of distortion: (1) classification errors from treatment effects and test limitations, quantified through confusion matrices derived from longitudinal records; and (2) self-selection bias from differential testing rates, estimated empirically by demographic segment. Demographic reweighting ensured representativeness with respect to census data. <b>Results</b>: Using diabetes as a test case, corrected estimates for 2024 showed an adult prevalence of 18.0%, compared to 14.1% based on raw laboratory frequencies. The large amount of data provided high-resolution estimates by age, sex, and location, enabling fine-grained detection of demographic and geographic disparities. <b>Conclusions</b>: Bias-corrected laboratory surveillance provides accurate, timely, and demographically representative estimates of chronic disease prevalence. The methodology is scalable, cost-effective, and broadly applicable to other multi-stage chronic conditions, offering a foundation for next-generation public health monitoring and targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233056
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chronic Disease Monitoring: Methodology for Classification Error and Self-Selection Bias Correction in Clinical Laboratory Data

Julian Velev, Abiel Roche-Lima, J. Fuentes Betancourt, Efrain Betancourt
Healthcare
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Chronic Disease Monitoring: Methodology for Classification Error and Self-Selection Bias Correction in Clinical Laboratory Data

Julian Velev, Abiel Roche-Lima, J. Fuentes Betancourt, Efrain Betancourt
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Chronic diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity and healthcare costs worldwide. Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent and costly chronic conditions in the United States, with a disproportionate burden in Puerto Rico. Surveillance of diabetes relies mainly on infrequent cohort studies and self-report surveys, which are limited in accuracy, segmentation, and timeliness. This study aimed to develop a generalizable methodology for monitoring chronic disease prevalence using routinely collected laboratory data, while correcting for systematic biases and diagnostic errors. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed more than five years of de-identified laboratory test results (2020-2024) from a large, island-wide network of clinical laboratories in Puerto Rico. To produce unbiased prevalence estimates, we applied a mathematical correction framework that accounted for two main sources of distortion: (1) classification errors from treatment effects and test limitations, quantified through confusion matrices derived from longitudinal records; and (2) self-selection bias from differential testing rates, estimated empirically by demographic segment. Demographic reweighting ensured representativeness with respect to census data. <b>Results</b>: Using diabetes as a test case, corrected estimates for 2024 showed an adult prevalence of 18.0%, compared to 14.1% based on raw laboratory frequencies. The large amount of data provided high-resolution estimates by age, sex, and location, enabling fine-grained detection of demographic and geographic disparities. <b>Conclusions</b>: Bias-corrected laboratory surveillance provides accurate, timely, and demographically representative estimates of chronic disease prevalence. The methodology is scalable, cost-effective, and broadly applicable to other multi-stage chronic conditions, offering a foundation for next-generation public health monitoring and targeted interventions.

HealthcareVol. 13(23)
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (PR), University of Puerto Rico System (PR), Puerto Rico Department of Health (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.