Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Objectives:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction, focusing on the percentage of new bone formation and residual graft material. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing histomorphometric outcomes in humans were included. Eligible studies compared ARP using various graft materials to unassisted socket healing. Primary outcome was new bone formation (%); secondary outcome was residual graft material (%). Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted based on graft material type, membrane application, and healing duration. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-two RCTs (816 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, ARP did not result in significantly greater new bone formation compared to spontaneous healing (mean difference -5.86%, 95% CI: -13.84% to 2.11%, <i>p</i> = 0.15; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%), revealing a paradoxical trend: while ARP maintains ridge volume, histologically it may yield slightly lower proportions of vital bone compared to unassisted healing. However, autologous biomaterials (e.g., PRF/CGF) and xenografts with collagen membranes showed significantly new bone formation (mean differences +16.28% and -22.47%; <i>p</i>< 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Residual graft content was highest in relation to xenografts and allografts, particularly without membranes. Long-term studies demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for ARP following excluding high-risk trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> Histological advantage of ARP is biomaterial-dependent. Autologous platelet concentrates and xenografts with membranes yielded the most consistent bone regeneration outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Although ARP preserves socket volume, its histological superiority over natural healing is not universal. Therefore, the selection of biomaterials and determination of and appropriate healing period are critical parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120556
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ioannis Vouros, Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Georgios S. Chatzopoulos, Ioanna Benekou
1 citations
Dentistry Journal
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
article

Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ioannis Vouros, Ioannis Fragkioudakis, Georgios S. Chatzopoulos, Ioanna Benekou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction, focusing on the percentage of new bone formation and residual graft material. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing histomorphometric outcomes in humans were included. Eligible studies compared ARP using various graft materials to unassisted socket healing. Primary outcome was new bone formation (%); secondary outcome was residual graft material (%). Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted based on graft material type, membrane application, and healing duration. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE, respectively. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-two RCTs (816 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, ARP did not result in significantly greater new bone formation compared to spontaneous healing (mean difference -5.86%, 95% CI: -13.84% to 2.11%, <i>p</i> = 0.15; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%), revealing a paradoxical trend: while ARP maintains ridge volume, histologically it may yield slightly lower proportions of vital bone compared to unassisted healing. However, autologous biomaterials (e.g., PRF/CGF) and xenografts with collagen membranes showed significantly new bone formation (mean differences +16.28% and -22.47%; <i>p</i>< 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Residual graft content was highest in relation to xenografts and allografts, particularly without membranes. Long-term studies demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for ARP following excluding high-risk trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> Histological advantage of ARP is biomaterial-dependent. Autologous platelet concentrates and xenografts with membranes yielded the most consistent bone regeneration outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Although ARP preserves socket volume, its histological superiority over natural healing is not universal. Therefore, the selection of biomaterials and determination of and appropriate healing period are critical parameters.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(12)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.