Integrating 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing into Personalized Medicine for Pharmaceuticals: Opportunities, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Over the last decade, additive manufacturing (AM) has been widely investigated for developing on-demand, patient-centric, and personalized medications. Among various AM techniques, fused deposition modeling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), inkjet printing, binder jet printing, stereolithography (SLA), and selective laser sintering (SLS) have been most widely studied for developing simple and complex pharmaceutical medications. Implementing the AM platform enables decentralized manufacturing of medications at the hospitals and clinical sites. The dose and release profiles of the dosage forms can be tailored based on patient needs, providing flexibility to the physician. In fact, streamlining the AM process into a continuous manufacturing process equipped with process analytical technology (PAT) tools will ensure the manufacturing and delivery of safe and efficacious medications to the patient population. Complex medications, such as polypills, which are complex and time-consuming to manufacture using traditional manufacturing techniques, can be printed quickly using the AM approach. The pediatric patient population can be attracted to medication by printing the dosage forms with a geometry of interest. The AM platform can be integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and health records to accelerate drug development and tailor medications based on patient conditions. Despite the various advantages that the AM platform brings to the pharmaceutical field, a few limitations, such as scalability, material innovation, secondary processing, and regulatory evolution, need to be addressed. This review article compares the advantages and limitations of the existing AM techniques along with a note on the recent advancements and future perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Pharmaceutica
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm93040061
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing into Personalized Medicine for Pharmaceuticals: Opportunities, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Prashanth Parupathi, Preethi Mandati, Dinesh Nyavanandi, Nithin Vidiyala et al.
1 citations
Scientia Pharmaceutica
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
article

Integrating 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing into Personalized Medicine for Pharmaceuticals: Opportunities, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Prashanth Parupathi, Preethi Mandati, Dinesh Nyavanandi, Nithin Vidiyala, Pavani Sunkishala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Over the last decade, additive manufacturing (AM) has been widely investigated for developing on-demand, patient-centric, and personalized medications. Among various AM techniques, fused deposition modeling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), inkjet printing, binder jet printing, stereolithography (SLA), and selective laser sintering (SLS) have been most widely studied for developing simple and complex pharmaceutical medications. Implementing the AM platform enables decentralized manufacturing of medications at the hospitals and clinical sites. The dose and release profiles of the dosage forms can be tailored based on patient needs, providing flexibility to the physician. In fact, streamlining the AM process into a continuous manufacturing process equipped with process analytical technology (PAT) tools will ensure the manufacturing and delivery of safe and efficacious medications to the patient population. Complex medications, such as polypills, which are complex and time-consuming to manufacture using traditional manufacturing techniques, can be printed quickly using the AM approach. The pediatric patient population can be attracted to medication by printing the dosage forms with a geometry of interest. The AM platform can be integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) and health records to accelerate drug development and tailor medications based on patient conditions. Despite the various advantages that the AM platform brings to the pharmaceutical field, a few limitations, such as scalability, material innovation, secondary processing, and regulatory evolution, need to be addressed. This review article compares the advantages and limitations of the existing AM techniques along with a note on the recent advancements and future perspectives.

Scientia PharmaceuticaVol. 93(4)
Long Island University (US), University of Mississippi (US), Purdue Pharma (United States) (US), Cerevel Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.