Authors' Reply: Refining the Map of Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

We thank Kazory and Koratala for their interest and comments1 on the implications of the Loop diuretic intensification Or adjuvant Thiazide in Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance study, published in JASN.2 Although we agree with Kazory and Koratala1 that the field would benefit from a more refined approach to diuretic resistance phenotyping, we respectfully disagree that the study findings were negative. Both diuretic escalation strategies significantly improved natriuresis in an objectively diuretic resistance cohort, with an adjuvant thiazide strategy showing clear superiority. However, the mechanisms underlying the improved natriuresis were not as hypothesized. Patients with diuretic resistance primarily in the loop of Henle had significantly worse natriuretic response with loop intensification compared with adjuvant thiazide, and those with a predominant distal mechanism of resistance did not respond preferentially to a thiazide. These significant observations challenge the conventional wisdom on the diuretic resistance mechanisms in acute heart failure, which are based on animal models. A valid criticism of our approach to defining diuretic resistance mechanistic subtypes using the median change in fractional excretion of lithium (FELi) was raised, and we agree that diuretic resistance mechanisms likely exist as a continuum rather than distinct categories. Kazory and Koratala1 suggested that using more extreme delta FELi values to categorize resistance mechanisms could improve classification and potentially affect our observations. To investigate this important question, we categorized resistance in the loop as the bottom quartile of delta FELi after the screening intravenous loop diuretic, and resistance in the distal tubules as the top quartile in a sensitivity analysis. The outcome of change in 6-hour natriuresis in this sensitivity analysis did not materially differ from the primary analysis for those randomized to loop intensification (loop resistance 23±35 mmol versus distal tubule resistance 81±83 mmol; P = 0.02) nor adjuvant thiazide (loop resistance 92±28 mmol versus distal tubule resistance 86±77 mmol; P = 0.82). These findings reinforce our conclusions that diuretic resistance mechanisms in human acute heart failure are different and more complicated than that previously suggested by animal models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000948
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authors' Reply: Refining the Map of Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

Jeffrey Moore Testani, Zachary L. Cox, Juan Betuel Ivey-Miranda, Veena S. Rao
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Authors' Reply: Refining the Map of Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

Jeffrey Moore Testani, Zachary L. Cox, Juan Betuel Ivey-Miranda, Veena S. Rao
article en

Abstract

We thank Kazory and Koratala for their interest and comments1 on the implications of the Loop diuretic intensification Or adjuvant Thiazide in Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance study, published in JASN.2 Although we agree with Kazory and Koratala1 that the field would benefit from a more refined approach to diuretic resistance phenotyping, we respectfully disagree that the study findings were negative. Both diuretic escalation strategies significantly improved natriuresis in an objectively diuretic resistance cohort, with an adjuvant thiazide strategy showing clear superiority. However, the mechanisms underlying the improved natriuresis were not as hypothesized. Patients with diuretic resistance primarily in the loop of Henle had significantly worse natriuretic response with loop intensification compared with adjuvant thiazide, and those with a predominant distal mechanism of resistance did not respond preferentially to a thiazide. These significant observations challenge the conventional wisdom on the diuretic resistance mechanisms in acute heart failure, which are based on animal models. A valid criticism of our approach to defining diuretic resistance mechanistic subtypes using the median change in fractional excretion of lithium (FELi) was raised, and we agree that diuretic resistance mechanisms likely exist as a continuum rather than distinct categories. Kazory and Koratala1 suggested that using more extreme delta FELi values to categorize resistance mechanisms could improve classification and potentially affect our observations. To investigate this important question, we categorized resistance in the loop as the bottom quartile of delta FELi after the screening intravenous loop diuretic, and resistance in the distal tubules as the top quartile in a sensitivity analysis. The outcome of change in 6-hour natriuresis in this sensitivity analysis did not materially differ from the primary analysis for those randomized to loop intensification (loop resistance 23±35 mmol versus distal tubule resistance 81±83 mmol; P = 0.02) nor adjuvant thiazide (loop resistance 92±28 mmol versus distal tubule resistance 86±77 mmol; P = 0.82). These findings reinforce our conclusions that diuretic resistance mechanisms in human acute heart failure are different and more complicated than that previously suggested by animal models.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), Lipscomb University (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.