Simulation‐Based Bayesian Predictive Probability of Success for Interim Monitoring of Clinical Trials With Competing Event Data: Two Case Studies

Bayesian predictive probabilities of success (PPoS) use interim trial data to calculate the probability of trial success. These quantities can be used to optimise trial size or to stop for futility. In this paper, we describe a simulation-based approach to compute the PPoS for clinical trials with competing event data, for which no specific methodology is currently available. The proposed procedure hinges on modelling the joint distribution of time to event and event type by specifying Bayesian models for the cause-specific hazards of all event types. This allows the prediction of outcome data at the conclusion of the trial. The PPoS is obtained by numerically averaging the probability of success evaluated at fixed parameter values over the posterior distribution of the parameters. Our work is motivated by two randomised clinical trials: the I-SPY COVID phase II trial for the treatment of severe COVID-19 (NCT04488081) and the STHLM3 prostate cancer diagnostic trial (ISRCTN84445406), both of which are characterised by competing event data. We present different modelling alternatives for the joint distribution of time to event and event type and show how the choice of the prior distributions can be used to assess the PPoS under different scenarios. The role of the PPoS analyses in the decision-making process for these two trials is also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70050
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation‐Based Bayesian Predictive Probability of Success for Interim Monitoring of Clinical Trials With Competing Event Data: Two Case Studies

Chiara Micoli, Martin Eklund, Alessio Crippa, Andrea Discacciati et al.
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Simulation‐Based Bayesian Predictive Probability of Success for Interim Monitoring of Clinical Trials With Competing Event Data: Two Case Studies

Chiara Micoli, Martin Eklund, Alessio Crippa, Andrea Discacciati, Jason T. Connor
article en

Abstract

Bayesian predictive probabilities of success (PPoS) use interim trial data to calculate the probability of trial success. These quantities can be used to optimise trial size or to stop for futility. In this paper, we describe a simulation-based approach to compute the PPoS for clinical trials with competing event data, for which no specific methodology is currently available. The proposed procedure hinges on modelling the joint distribution of time to event and event type by specifying Bayesian models for the cause-specific hazards of all event types. This allows the prediction of outcome data at the conclusion of the trial. The PPoS is obtained by numerically averaging the probability of success evaluated at fixed parameter values over the posterior distribution of the parameters. Our work is motivated by two randomised clinical trials: the I-SPY COVID phase II trial for the treatment of severe COVID-19 (NCT04488081) and the STHLM3 prostate cancer diagnostic trial (ISRCTN84445406), both of which are characterised by competing event data. We present different modelling alternatives for the joint distribution of time to event and event type and show how the choice of the prior distributions can be used to assess the PPoS under different scenarios. The role of the PPoS analyses in the decision-making process for these two trials is also discussed.

Pharmaceutical StatisticsVol. 25(1)
University of Central Florida (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County (US), Confluence Life Sciences (United States) (US), Florida College (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Amgen, Pfizer, George Mason University, Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Cancerfonden, Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Genentech, Allergan, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.