Comparing State-Representations for DEL Model Checking

Model checking with the standard Kripke models used in (Dynamic) Epistemic Logic leads to scalability issues.Hence alternative representations have been developed, in particular symbolic structures based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and succinct models based on mental programs.While symbolic structures have been shown to perform well in practice, their theoretical complexity was not known so far.On the other hand, for succinct models model checking is known to be PSPACEcomplete, but no implementations are available.We close this gap and directly relate the two representations.We show that model checking DEL on symbolic structures encoded with BDDs is also PSPACE-complete.In fact, already model checking Epistemic Logic without dynamics is PSPACE-complete on symbolic structures.We also provide direct translations between BDDs and mental programs.Both translations yield exponential outputs.For the translation from mental programs to BDDs we show that no small translation exists.For the other direction we conjecture the same.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.437.21
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing State-Representations for DEL Model Checking

Malvin Gattinger, Avijeet Ghosh, Houtianfu Wang, Gregor Behnke
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Comparing State-Representations for DEL Model Checking

Malvin Gattinger, Avijeet Ghosh, Houtianfu Wang, Gregor Behnke
article en

Abstract

Model checking with the standard Kripke models used in (Dynamic) Epistemic Logic leads to scalability issues.Hence alternative representations have been developed, in particular symbolic structures based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) and succinct models based on mental programs.While symbolic structures have been shown to perform well in practice, their theoretical complexity was not known so far.On the other hand, for succinct models model checking is known to be PSPACEcomplete, but no implementations are available.We close this gap and directly relate the two representations.We show that model checking DEL on symbolic structures encoded with BDDs is also PSPACE-complete.In fact, already model checking Epistemic Logic without dynamics is PSPACE-complete on symbolic structures.We also provide direct translations between BDDs and mental programs.Both translations yield exponential outputs.For the translation from mental programs to BDDs we show that no small translation exists.For the other direction we conjecture the same.

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 437
Chennai Mathematical Institute (IN), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.