Homophily in Southeast Asian University collaborations: evaluating internationalization and collaboration through bibliometric collaboration data

This study investigates the influence of homophily rooted in institutional rankings on the structure and dynamics of international research collaboration networks among Southeast Asian universities and examines its implications for regional academic stratification and inequality. Utilizing bibliometric data from 175 universities certified by the ASEAN University Network, we employed social network analysis (SNA) to map collaboration patterns using centrality metrics (eigenvector, betweenness, closeness, and degree) and clique analysis. Our findings reveal a pronounced ‘rich-get-richer’ dynamic, in which top-ranked institutions, predominantly from Malaysia and Singapore, dominate collaboration networks, controlling 75.69% of the connections. Elite universities, such as Universiti Malaya (eigenvector centrality: 0.989) and the National University of Singapore (degree centrality: 0.224), function as structural brokers, reinforcing exclusivity and marginalizing lower-ranked institutions. Conversely, despite their numerical predominance, Indonesian universities exhibit a fragmented influence, whereas those in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar remain peripheral with near-zero centrality metrics. Clique analysis further underscores regional fragmentation, with large collaborative clusters (≥21) dominated by Indonesian institutions, reflecting inward-oriented networks. This study identifies a stark core-periphery divide exacerbated by preferential attachment mechanisms and resource disparities that perpetuate academic inequality. These findings challenge the presumed egalitarian benefits of internationalization, highlighting how institutional ranking homophily entrenches stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2590867
Citations
1
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homophily in Southeast Asian University collaborations: evaluating internationalization and collaboration through bibliometric collaboration data

Muhammad Rizki Pratama, Purwoko Purwoko, Baharuddin Baharuddin, Amira Oribia Wanda Sasmita et al.
1 citations
Cogent Education
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
article

Homophily in Southeast Asian University collaborations: evaluating internationalization and collaboration through bibliometric collaboration data

Muhammad Rizki Pratama, Purwoko Purwoko, Baharuddin Baharuddin, Amira Oribia Wanda Sasmita, Eka Yuda Gunawibawa, Adi Wijaya, Bayu Indra Pratama, Budi Hermawan, Naufal Farras Alfattahu, Rakha Hafish Setiawan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of homophily rooted in institutional rankings on the structure and dynamics of international research collaboration networks among Southeast Asian universities and examines its implications for regional academic stratification and inequality. Utilizing bibliometric data from 175 universities certified by the ASEAN University Network, we employed social network analysis (SNA) to map collaboration patterns using centrality metrics (eigenvector, betweenness, closeness, and degree) and clique analysis. Our findings reveal a pronounced ‘rich-get-richer’ dynamic, in which top-ranked institutions, predominantly from Malaysia and Singapore, dominate collaboration networks, controlling 75.69% of the connections. Elite universities, such as Universiti Malaya (eigenvector centrality: 0.989) and the National University of Singapore (degree centrality: 0.224), function as structural brokers, reinforcing exclusivity and marginalizing lower-ranked institutions. Conversely, despite their numerical predominance, Indonesian universities exhibit a fragmented influence, whereas those in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar remain peripheral with near-zero centrality metrics. Clique analysis further underscores regional fragmentation, with large collaborative clusters (≥21) dominated by Indonesian institutions, reflecting inward-oriented networks. This study identifies a stark core-periphery divide exacerbated by preferential attachment mechanisms and resource disparities that perpetuate academic inequality. These findings challenge the presumed egalitarian benefits of internationalization, highlighting how institutional ranking homophily entrenches stratification.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
Lampung University (ID), University of Surabaya (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), University of Brawijaya (ID), University of Indonesia (ID), Solusi University (ZW), Krida Wacana Christian University (ID), UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (ID), Health Information Management (BE), Universitas Bandar Lampung (ID), Universitas 45 Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.