Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Diagnostic Criteria and Controversies: Perspectives and Guidance From Pathologists in the MLA Consortium

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a rare and aggressive gynecologic malignancy that has only been recognized in the last decade. It arises in the endometrium, ovaries, and other extrauterine sites (often in association with endometriosis) and closely mimics a variety of other tumor types that occur in these locations. While it shows significant morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular homology with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinoma, there are many clinicopathologic features that suggest müllerian derivation, and this is now well established. As research on MLA has accumulated, questions have emerged about optimal practices for the diagnosis of these challenging tumors. In 2022, faculty at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center convened the Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Consortium, comprised of international pathologists, gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and basic science investigators with expertise in MLA, with the goals to enhance understanding of these tumors, refine diagnostic criteria, improve treatment options, and facilitate research collaborations. An initial review from the consortium was published in 2025, and included diagnostic recommendations from the group's pathologists. Controversies remain, however, about the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular criteria that should be used to establish a diagnosis of MLA. Herein, the pathologists from the MLA Consortium provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on MLA diagnostic criteria, address ongoing controversies in this area, and provide practical guidance for pathologists considering this entity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pgp.0000000000001150
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Diagnostic Criteria and Controversies: Perspectives and Guidance From Pathologists in the MLA Consortium

Jelena Mirković, W. Glenn McCluggage, David L. Kolin, Kay J. Park et al.
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Diagnostic Criteria and Controversies: Perspectives and Guidance From Pathologists in the MLA Consortium

Jelena Mirković, W. Glenn McCluggage, David L. Kolin, Kay J. Park, Anne M. Mills, Brooke E. Howitt, Kari Lassen Ring, Jeffrey How, Elizabeth D. Euscher, Lien Hoang, Hyun-Soo Kim, Karen H. Lu
article en

Abstract

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a rare and aggressive gynecologic malignancy that has only been recognized in the last decade. It arises in the endometrium, ovaries, and other extrauterine sites (often in association with endometriosis) and closely mimics a variety of other tumor types that occur in these locations. While it shows significant morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular homology with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinoma, there are many clinicopathologic features that suggest müllerian derivation, and this is now well established. As research on MLA has accumulated, questions have emerged about optimal practices for the diagnosis of these challenging tumors. In 2022, faculty at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center convened the Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Consortium, comprised of international pathologists, gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and basic science investigators with expertise in MLA, with the goals to enhance understanding of these tumors, refine diagnostic criteria, improve treatment options, and facilitate research collaborations. An initial review from the consortium was published in 2025, and included diagnostic recommendations from the group's pathologists. Controversies remain, however, about the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular criteria that should be used to establish a diagnosis of MLA. Herein, the pathologists from the MLA Consortium provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on MLA diagnostic criteria, address ongoing controversies in this area, and provide practical guidance for pathologists considering this entity.

International Journal of Gynecological PathologyVol. 45(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Virginia Health System (US), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Vancouver General Hospital (CA), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.