Controller Area Network–Based Vehicle Safety System

<div>This article entails the design, manufacturing, application, testing, and analysis/discussion of a controller area network (CAN)–based vehicle safety system that detects vehicle failure such as brake failure, gear failure, tire blowouts, and other failures that can be monitored using digital or analogue sensors. The aim and objectives are to implement a real-life tire blowout on an Iveco S-Way Euro III and design a system that sends out CAN-based messages using J1939 protocol to the Iveco S-Way Euro III to downshift the gears, retarders, activate the limp mode braking system, activate the hooter, and activate the hazards. The system is split into five sections: (1) detection and activation, (2) gear control system, (3) retarder control system, (4) braking control system, and (5) hooter and hazard control system; while analyzing the: acceleration in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical acceleration (g) vs. time (s), vehicle speed (km/h), rate of deflation (s), and the steering torque (Nm). The findings show that pressure (bar) vs. time (ms) indicates that the rate of deflation without the countermeasures took 1.053 s longer, wheel speed (mph) vs. time (s) indicates that the testing without countermeasures took 3.9800 s longer to reach 0 km/h, steering torque (Nm) vs. time (ms) indicates that the testing without countermeasures had a maximum value that was 0.1179 Nm higher than the testing with countermeasures, longitudinal acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicates that the testing without countermeasures has more sporadic values, lateral acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicated the testing with countermeasures has a 0.132 g higher lateral acceleration, and vertical acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicated that both tests (with and without countermeasures) have almost the same maximum vertical acceleration when the tire blowout occurred with the test without countermeasures having a 0.02 g higher vertical acceleration than the testing with countermeasures.</div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/09-13-02-0011
Primary Topic
IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Controller Area Network–Based Vehicle Safety System

Craig Proctor-Parker, Riaan Stopforth, Amaan Rampath
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
article

Controller Area Network–Based Vehicle Safety System

Craig Proctor-Parker, Riaan Stopforth, Amaan Rampath
article en

Abstract

<div>This article entails the design, manufacturing, application, testing, and analysis/discussion of a controller area network (CAN)–based vehicle safety system that detects vehicle failure such as brake failure, gear failure, tire blowouts, and other failures that can be monitored using digital or analogue sensors. The aim and objectives are to implement a real-life tire blowout on an Iveco S-Way Euro III and design a system that sends out CAN-based messages using J1939 protocol to the Iveco S-Way Euro III to downshift the gears, retarders, activate the limp mode braking system, activate the hooter, and activate the hazards. The system is split into five sections: (1) detection and activation, (2) gear control system, (3) retarder control system, (4) braking control system, and (5) hooter and hazard control system; while analyzing the: acceleration in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical acceleration (g) vs. time (s), vehicle speed (km/h), rate of deflation (s), and the steering torque (Nm). The findings show that pressure (bar) vs. time (ms) indicates that the rate of deflation without the countermeasures took 1.053 s longer, wheel speed (mph) vs. time (s) indicates that the testing without countermeasures took 3.9800 s longer to reach 0 km/h, steering torque (Nm) vs. time (ms) indicates that the testing without countermeasures had a maximum value that was 0.1179 Nm higher than the testing with countermeasures, longitudinal acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicates that the testing without countermeasures has more sporadic values, lateral acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicated the testing with countermeasures has a 0.132 g higher lateral acceleration, and vertical acceleration (g) vs time (s) indicated that both tests (with and without countermeasures) have almost the same maximum vertical acceleration when the tire blowout occurred with the test without countermeasures having a 0.02 g higher vertical acceleration than the testing with countermeasures.</div>

SAE International Journal of Transportation SafetyVol. 13(2)
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.