Tinzaparin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Cancer: A Comparative Modeling Study

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is common and a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer. In specific CAT scenarios, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), including tinzaparin, are preferred over direct oral anticoagulants. Despite the importance of understanding LMWH pharmacokinetics (PK) in cancer for optimizing CAT management, available data remain limited.To compare tinzaparin PK in cancer and non-cancer patients by developing a population PK model.This prospective, multicenter, case-: control trial enrolled patients receiving once-daily subcutaneous tinzaparin at a therapeutic dose of 175 IU·kg<sup>-1</sup>, including matched cancer and non-cancer patients. Plasma anti-Xa activity was measured at multiple time points and analyzed using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling. A PK model was developed, and covariate effects were assessed for parameters of the model. The impact of cancer on tinzaparin PK was evaluated by incorporating cancer status as a categorical covariate.A total of 333 patients (including 46 matched cancer and non-cancer patients) were included in the analysis. A monocompartmental model with first-order absorption best described tinzaparin PK. The volume of distribution was associated with body weight, while clearance and anti-Xa activity were associated with creatinine clearance. No significant differences were observed between matched cancer and non-cancer patients in anti-Xa activity exposure at day 1 and steady state.PK profiles were comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients. Additionally, further studies should clarify the role of renal function in guiding tinzaparin dosing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2740-1841
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinzaparin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Cancer: A Comparative Modeling Study

Olivier Sanchez, Juliette Djadi‐Prat, Laurent Bertoletti, Isabelle Mahé et al.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Tinzaparin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Cancer: A Comparative Modeling Study

Olivier Sanchez, Juliette Djadi‐Prat, Laurent Bertoletti, Isabelle Mahé, Aurélie Vilfaillot, Nicolas Falvo, Jean Escal, Benjamin Crichi, Xavier Delavenne, Michel Pavic, Sara Zia-Chahabi, Marie‐Antoinette Sevestre, Dominique Helley, Laetitia Mauge, Francis Couturaud, Guy Meyer, Patrick Mismetti
article en

Abstract

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is common and a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer. In specific CAT scenarios, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), including tinzaparin, are preferred over direct oral anticoagulants. Despite the importance of understanding LMWH pharmacokinetics (PK) in cancer for optimizing CAT management, available data remain limited.To compare tinzaparin PK in cancer and non-cancer patients by developing a population PK model.This prospective, multicenter, case-: control trial enrolled patients receiving once-daily subcutaneous tinzaparin at a therapeutic dose of 175 IU·kg<sup>-1</sup>, including matched cancer and non-cancer patients. Plasma anti-Xa activity was measured at multiple time points and analyzed using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling. A PK model was developed, and covariate effects were assessed for parameters of the model. The impact of cancer on tinzaparin PK was evaluated by incorporating cancer status as a categorical covariate.A total of 333 patients (including 46 matched cancer and non-cancer patients) were included in the analysis. A monocompartmental model with first-order absorption best described tinzaparin PK. The volume of distribution was associated with body weight, while clearance and anti-Xa activity were associated with creatinine clearance. No significant differences were observed between matched cancer and non-cancer patients in anti-Xa activity exposure at day 1 and steady state.PK profiles were comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients. Additionally, further studies should clarify the role of renal function in guiding tinzaparin dosing.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Inserm (FR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Hôpital Louis-Mourier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR), Hôpital Européen (FR), Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.