Efficacy and safety of probiotic therapy for halitosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in managing halitosis and to determine the optimal intervention strategies. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to December 2024, focusing on studies evaluating probiotic interventions for halitosis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken to assess the robustness of the results and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. All analyses were performed through Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.0. Of the 194 records initially identified, 10 studies met the predefined criteria. The pooled results demonstrated a significant reduction in volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) levels in the probiotic group compared to controls (SMD = - 1.01, 95% CI [-1.93, -0.09],<i>P</i>= 0.03). Likewise, the organoleptic test (OLT) scores showed a marked improvement in the probiotic group (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.22, 1.41],<i>P</i>< 0.00001). Nevertheless, no substantial differences were observed between groups in oral health-related quality of life (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.49],<i>P</i>= 0.12), subjective oral health status (SMD = - 0.04, 95% CI [-0.35, 0.28],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.74), depression (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.35],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.85), self-esteem (SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI [-0.39, 0.25],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.67), OLT scores (SMD = - 0.24, 95% CI [-0.64, 0.16],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.24), or plaque index (SMD = - 0.06, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.46],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.82). The findings suggest that probiotic therapy, when combined with conventional treatments, may be more effective in enhancing OLT scores and reducing VSC levels in individuals with halitosis than using probiotic alone. Nonetheless, potential publication bias, limited sample sizes, and heterogeneity among the included clinical trials may affect the reliability of these conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breath Research
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ae23f0
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of probiotic therapy for halitosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hualian Liu, Jie Ge, Yichen Yang, Yuanyuan Chen
Journal of Breath Research
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Efficacy and safety of probiotic therapy for halitosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hualian Liu, Jie Ge, Yichen Yang, Yuanyuan Chen
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in managing halitosis and to determine the optimal intervention strategies. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to December 2024, focusing on studies evaluating probiotic interventions for halitosis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken to assess the robustness of the results and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. All analyses were performed through Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.0. Of the 194 records initially identified, 10 studies met the predefined criteria. The pooled results demonstrated a significant reduction in volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) levels in the probiotic group compared to controls (SMD = - 1.01, 95% CI [-1.93, -0.09],<i>P</i>= 0.03). Likewise, the organoleptic test (OLT) scores showed a marked improvement in the probiotic group (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.22, 1.41],<i>P</i>< 0.00001). Nevertheless, no substantial differences were observed between groups in oral health-related quality of life (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.49],<i>P</i>= 0.12), subjective oral health status (SMD = - 0.04, 95% CI [-0.35, 0.28],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.74), depression (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.35],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.85), self-esteem (SMD = - 0.07, 95% CI [-0.39, 0.25],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.67), OLT scores (SMD = - 0.24, 95% CI [-0.64, 0.16],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.24), or plaque index (SMD = - 0.06, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.46],<i>I</i><sup>2</sup>= 0%,<i>p</i>= 0.82). The findings suggest that probiotic therapy, when combined with conventional treatments, may be more effective in enhancing OLT scores and reducing VSC levels in individuals with halitosis than using probiotic alone. Nonetheless, potential publication bias, limited sample sizes, and heterogeneity among the included clinical trials may affect the reliability of these conclusions.

Journal of Breath ResearchVol. 20(1)
Soochow University (CN), The First People's Hospital of Changzhou (CN), Changzhou Third People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.