Minimal learning machine for multi-label learning
Abstract Distance-based supervised method, the minimal learning machine, constructs a predictive model from data by learning a mapping between input and output distance matrices. In this paper, we propose new methods and evaluate how their core component, the distance mapping, can be adapted to multi-label learning. The proposed approach is based on combining the distance mapping with an inverse distance weighting. Although the proposal is one of the simplest methods in the multi-label learning literature, it achieves state-of-the-art performance for small to moderate-sized multi-label learning problems. In addition to its simplicity, the proposed method is fully deterministic: Its hyper-parameter can be selected via ranking loss-based statistic which has a closed form, thus avoiding conventional cross-validation-based hyper-parameter tuning. In addition, due to its simple linear distance mapping-based construction, we demonstrate that the proposed method can assess the uncertainty of the predictions for multi-label classification, which is a valuable capability for data-centric machine learning pipelines.
Authors
- Amauri H. Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-0781)
- César Mattos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2404-3625)
- Joonas Hämäläinen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-9232)
- Tommi Kärkkäinen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-1167)
- João P. P. Gomes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1686-595X)
- Antoine Hubermont (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6737-8141)
Institutions
- University of Namur (BE)
- Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
- Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará (BR)
- Flemish Radio and Television Broadcasting Organisation (BE)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Machine Learning
- Published
- 2025-11-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-025-06923-w
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.48