Investigation of data-driven stopping power calibration of treatment planning x-ray CT from simulated sparse-view proton radiographies

<i>Objective.</i>Proton therapy treatment planning currently needs to account for relatively large range uncertainty margins primarily due to the semi-empirical calibration of the treatment planning x-ray computed tomography (CT) to proton stopping power relative to water (RSP). Proton radiography enables direct measurement of integral RSP, offering potential to improve calibration and reduce these uncertainties.<i>Approach.</i>Three deep neural network architectures are trained to infer a patient RSP map using the treatment planning CT and proton radiographies, assuming straight proton trajectories. The best suited architecture is then evaluated on more realistic, clinical-like data generated with Monte Carlo simulations. Three idealized proton imaging detectors are simulated: single particle tracking (SPT), a pixelated energy-resolving imager (PERI) and a proton-integrating detector (PID).<i>Main results.</i>The learned primal dual (LPD) architetcure performs best in the simplified imaging scenario. In the more realistic scenario, the initial calibration error (median absolute percentage error of 2.24% across the test set) is reduced using only two projections across all detector types. SPT and PERI reach similar performance (1.10%/1.12%), followed by PID (1.30%). Restricting the LPD to the calibration task by incorporating prior knowledge of the functional relationship of Hounsfield Units (HUs) and RSP further improves calibration performance. For SPT, conventional optimization on detector data acquired for individual protons outperformed the data-driven method (0.16% vs. 1.10%). However, for PERI and PID, the data-driven approach (1.12%/1.30%) slightly outperformed conventional optimization (1.63%/1.72%).<i>Significance.</i>To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply a deep learning-based approach fusing proton radiographies and treatment planning CT data for improved RSP calibration. The method achieves lower calibration errors than idealized, conventional calibration curve optimization on PERIs and PIDs-detector types that offer a promising path for clinical adoption due to their lower complexity and cost compared to SPT systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae2418
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of data-driven stopping power calibration of treatment planning x-ray CT from simulated sparse-view proton radiographies

Katia Parodi, Ines Butz, A. Schiavi, Chiara Gianoli et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Investigation of data-driven stopping power calibration of treatment planning x-ray CT from simulated sparse-view proton radiographies

Katia Parodi, Ines Butz, A. Schiavi, Chiara Gianoli, Hector Andrade Loarca, Ozan Öktem, Gitta Kutyniok, V. Patera
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Proton therapy treatment planning currently needs to account for relatively large range uncertainty margins primarily due to the semi-empirical calibration of the treatment planning x-ray computed tomography (CT) to proton stopping power relative to water (RSP). Proton radiography enables direct measurement of integral RSP, offering potential to improve calibration and reduce these uncertainties.<i>Approach.</i>Three deep neural network architectures are trained to infer a patient RSP map using the treatment planning CT and proton radiographies, assuming straight proton trajectories. The best suited architecture is then evaluated on more realistic, clinical-like data generated with Monte Carlo simulations. Three idealized proton imaging detectors are simulated: single particle tracking (SPT), a pixelated energy-resolving imager (PERI) and a proton-integrating detector (PID).<i>Main results.</i>The learned primal dual (LPD) architetcure performs best in the simplified imaging scenario. In the more realistic scenario, the initial calibration error (median absolute percentage error of 2.24% across the test set) is reduced using only two projections across all detector types. SPT and PERI reach similar performance (1.10%/1.12%), followed by PID (1.30%). Restricting the LPD to the calibration task by incorporating prior knowledge of the functional relationship of Hounsfield Units (HUs) and RSP further improves calibration performance. For SPT, conventional optimization on detector data acquired for individual protons outperformed the data-driven method (0.16% vs. 1.10%). However, for PERI and PID, the data-driven approach (1.12%/1.30%) slightly outperformed conventional optimization (1.63%/1.72%).<i>Significance.</i>To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply a deep learning-based approach fusing proton radiographies and treatment planning CT data for improved RSP calibration. The method achieves lower calibration errors than idealized, conventional calibration curve optimization on PERIs and PIDs-detector types that offer a promising path for clinical adoption due to their lower complexity and cost compared to SPT systems.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(24)
Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.