Rates of CT myelography epidural contrast extravasation at puncture site by spinal needle type

BackgroundEpidural contrast extravasation (ECE) at the level of lumbar puncture site during CT myelography (CTM) is a noted phenomenon without determined clinical relevance. While prior randomized studies in spinal analgesia have shown benefits of pencil-type spinal needles compared to cutting-type for dural punctures, rates of ECE on imaging have not been closely studied, and no prior study has investigated the effect of spinal needle type technical factors on ECE rate.MethodsAll CTM cases over an 8-year period for any indication (e.g., spontaneous intracranial hypotension CSF leak evaluation) were retrospectively reviewed. A large series of cases (n = 276) were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists for presence of puncture site ECE (n = 63), ECE extending at least one vertebral body level (n = 15), or no ECE (n = 198). Rates were compared by several technical factors including spinal needle type, gauge, and puncture site level.ResultsPencil-type spinal needles had significantly greater rates of any ECE (32%) versus cutting-type (25%, p = 0.030) and for ECE at puncture site only (25% vs. 20%, respectively) and ECE with extension greater than one vertebral body level (7% vs. 4%, respectively, p = 0.004). The rate of ECE did not differ by needle gauge, needle type/gauge combinations, or level accessed (p > 0.05). The need for post-dural puncture targeted epidural blood patch did not differ by presence of ECE (p = 0.190).ConclusionsThe rate of ECE in CTM was common (28% of cases) and occurred with slightly greater frequency with pencil-type spinal needles. As CTM and the use of pencil-type spinal needles become more prevalent in the investigation of spinal CSF leak, it is important to convey that asymptomatic ECE can be a common expected post-dural puncture finding with both pencil-type and cutting-type spinal needles and should not be confused for the site of leak when evaluating patients for spontaneous spinal CSF leak. Further, our results that immediate ECE do not correlate with symptomatic post-dural puncture headache differ from a recent retrospective series, and the imaging finding alone of ECE does not warrant further evaluation in an asymptomatic patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Neuroradiology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251399738
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rates of CT myelography epidural contrast extravasation at puncture site by spinal needle type

Andrew D. Schweitzer, Gayle R. Salama, Joshua Loewenstern, Pierce W. McMahon et al.
Interventional Neuroradiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Rates of CT myelography epidural contrast extravasation at puncture site by spinal needle type

Andrew D. Schweitzer, Gayle R. Salama, Joshua Loewenstern, Pierce W. McMahon, Sara Strauß, Usama Sattar
article en

Abstract

BackgroundEpidural contrast extravasation (ECE) at the level of lumbar puncture site during CT myelography (CTM) is a noted phenomenon without determined clinical relevance. While prior randomized studies in spinal analgesia have shown benefits of pencil-type spinal needles compared to cutting-type for dural punctures, rates of ECE on imaging have not been closely studied, and no prior study has investigated the effect of spinal needle type technical factors on ECE rate.MethodsAll CTM cases over an 8-year period for any indication (e.g., spontaneous intracranial hypotension CSF leak evaluation) were retrospectively reviewed. A large series of cases (n = 276) were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists for presence of puncture site ECE (n = 63), ECE extending at least one vertebral body level (n = 15), or no ECE (n = 198). Rates were compared by several technical factors including spinal needle type, gauge, and puncture site level.ResultsPencil-type spinal needles had significantly greater rates of any ECE (32%) versus cutting-type (25%, p = 0.030) and for ECE at puncture site only (25% vs. 20%, respectively) and ECE with extension greater than one vertebral body level (7% vs. 4%, respectively, p = 0.004). The rate of ECE did not differ by needle gauge, needle type/gauge combinations, or level accessed (p > 0.05). The need for post-dural puncture targeted epidural blood patch did not differ by presence of ECE (p = 0.190).ConclusionsThe rate of ECE in CTM was common (28% of cases) and occurred with slightly greater frequency with pencil-type spinal needles. As CTM and the use of pencil-type spinal needles become more prevalent in the investigation of spinal CSF leak, it is important to convey that asymptomatic ECE can be a common expected post-dural puncture finding with both pencil-type and cutting-type spinal needles and should not be confused for the site of leak when evaluating patients for spontaneous spinal CSF leak. Further, our results that immediate ECE do not correlate with symptomatic post-dural puncture headache differ from a recent retrospective series, and the imaging finding alone of ECE does not warrant further evaluation in an asymptomatic patient.

Interventional Neuroradiology
Cornell University (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.