Leadership in numbers

Abstract This paper examines how former Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong strategically deployed personal pronouns — especially we — in National Day Rally (NDR) speeches (2004–2023) to construct authority, manage affect, and negotiate state–citizen alignment. Situated within Singapore’s hybrid political system, the study adopts a corpus pragmatic approach combining frequency analysis, collocate profiling, and a substitution-based method to track inclusive and exclusive we alongside broader patterns of I , you , and they . Informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), deixis, and modality, the analysis shows that we functions as an indexical pivot modulating institutional stance around elections, milestones, and crises: exclusive we dominates early speeches and reflects technocratic leadership, while inclusive forms rise during periods of public outreach and pandemic response. These findings demonstrate that pronoun choice acts as a rhetorical device for distributing agency, calibrating legitimacy, and adapting leadership style to political context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Politics
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.25089.che
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership in numbers

Ali A. Al-Kandari, Khin Wee Chen
Journal of Language and Politics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Leadership in numbers

Ali A. Al-Kandari, Khin Wee Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines how former Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong strategically deployed personal pronouns — especially we — in National Day Rally (NDR) speeches (2004–2023) to construct authority, manage affect, and negotiate state–citizen alignment. Situated within Singapore’s hybrid political system, the study adopts a corpus pragmatic approach combining frequency analysis, collocate profiling, and a substitution-based method to track inclusive and exclusive we alongside broader patterns of I , you , and they . Informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), deixis, and modality, the analysis shows that we functions as an indexical pivot modulating institutional stance around elections, milestones, and crises: exclusive we dominates early speeches and reflects technocratic leadership, while inclusive forms rise during periods of public outreach and pandemic response. These findings demonstrate that pronoun choice acts as a rhetorical device for distributing agency, calibrating legitimacy, and adapting leadership style to political context.

Journal of Language and Politics
Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Masaryk University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.