Situating automated infrastructure: (Dis)continuities, contingencies and spatialities

In this themed issue, we examine the life and implication of the proliferation of ‘automated infrastructure’ in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we focus on the ways in which automation of various kinds – in labour processes, commerce and office spaces, border control, and even caregiving – have warped, (re)regulated and securitized the time-spaces in which people live, through infrastructure. While not treating the pandemic as an epochal event, the editorial highlights the significant technological ruptures that it has wrought, arguing that it has initiated an acute re-organization of space that society is still grappling with (if not reeling from). We consider the (dis)continuities of these automated infrastructures in relation to the past, the contingencies in their current use and adoption, as well as the spatialities that result from them. Using the papers in this issue as points of departure, we contemplate how, and why, life after COVID has become more political, uneven, unequal and restless, thanks to a renewed concentration of power in the hands of capital and governments, through automated infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning D Society and Space
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758251397281
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situating automated infrastructure: (Dis)continuities, contingencies and spatialities

Weiqiang Lin, Peter Adey, Tina Harris, Dylan Brady
Environment and Planning D Society and Space
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Situating automated infrastructure: (Dis)continuities, contingencies and spatialities

Weiqiang Lin, Peter Adey, Tina Harris, Dylan Brady
article en

Abstract

In this themed issue, we examine the life and implication of the proliferation of ‘automated infrastructure’ in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we focus on the ways in which automation of various kinds – in labour processes, commerce and office spaces, border control, and even caregiving – have warped, (re)regulated and securitized the time-spaces in which people live, through infrastructure. While not treating the pandemic as an epochal event, the editorial highlights the significant technological ruptures that it has wrought, arguing that it has initiated an acute re-organization of space that society is still grappling with (if not reeling from). We consider the (dis)continuities of these automated infrastructures in relation to the past, the contingencies in their current use and adoption, as well as the spatialities that result from them. Using the papers in this issue as points of departure, we contemplate how, and why, life after COVID has become more political, uneven, unequal and restless, thanks to a renewed concentration of power in the hands of capital and governments, through automated infrastructure.

Environment and Planning D Society and SpaceVol. 44(1)
National University of Singapore (SG), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.