The impact of convergence insufficiency on selective visual attention among university students

Convergence insufficiency (CI) is a common binocular vision disorder that impairs near vision-related tasks and is associated with symptoms such as eye strain, headaches, and reading difficulties. This study examined the effect of CI on selective visual attention by comparing performance on a modified visual search task between patients with CI and visually normal controls. A total of 42 male university students participated, including 20 patients diagnosed with CI and 22 age-matched controls. Participants completed a computerized visual search task involving different levels of target-distractor similarity and number of distractors. Accuracy (percent correct) and reaction time (RT) were recorded across task conditions. Reaction time was significantly slower in the CI group across all task conditions (mean RT: 1.21 ± 0.15 s) compared to controls (mean RT: 0.97 ± 0.12 s; main effect of group: F(1,160) = 38.2, p < 0.0001), while accuracy did not significantly differ between groups (CI: 86.3% ± 5.7; controls: 87.1% ± 6.1; F(1,160) = 0.002, p = 0.97). Task difficulty significantly influenced both accuracy (F(3,160) = 37.9, p < 0.001) and reaction time (F(3,160) = 5.1, p = 0.002), but no interaction effects were observed. Moreover, linear regression revealed a significant positive correlation between CISS scores and reaction time within the CI group (R² = 0.30, p = 0.01), indicating that higher symptom severity was associated with greater cognitive processing delay. In conclusion, CI has a negative impact on processing speed but not on accuracy during attentionally demanding tasks. These findings have implications for academic performance and highlight the importance of considering visual processing speed in clinical assessments and interventions for CI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336715
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of convergence insufficiency on selective visual attention among university students

Mohammed M. Alnawmasi
PLoS ONE
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

The impact of convergence insufficiency on selective visual attention among university students

Mohammed M. Alnawmasi
article en

Abstract

Convergence insufficiency (CI) is a common binocular vision disorder that impairs near vision-related tasks and is associated with symptoms such as eye strain, headaches, and reading difficulties. This study examined the effect of CI on selective visual attention by comparing performance on a modified visual search task between patients with CI and visually normal controls. A total of 42 male university students participated, including 20 patients diagnosed with CI and 22 age-matched controls. Participants completed a computerized visual search task involving different levels of target-distractor similarity and number of distractors. Accuracy (percent correct) and reaction time (RT) were recorded across task conditions. Reaction time was significantly slower in the CI group across all task conditions (mean RT: 1.21 ± 0.15 s) compared to controls (mean RT: 0.97 ± 0.12 s; main effect of group: F(1,160) = 38.2, p < 0.0001), while accuracy did not significantly differ between groups (CI: 86.3% ± 5.7; controls: 87.1% ± 6.1; F(1,160) = 0.002, p = 0.97). Task difficulty significantly influenced both accuracy (F(3,160) = 37.9, p < 0.001) and reaction time (F(3,160) = 5.1, p = 0.002), but no interaction effects were observed. Moreover, linear regression revealed a significant positive correlation between CISS scores and reaction time within the CI group (R² = 0.30, p = 0.01), indicating that higher symptom severity was associated with greater cognitive processing delay. In conclusion, CI has a negative impact on processing speed but not on accuracy during attentionally demanding tasks. These findings have implications for academic performance and highlight the importance of considering visual processing speed in clinical assessments and interventions for CI.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(11)
Qassim University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.