Un-Nudging Pay Gaps: The Role of Pay Raise Budget Framing

ABSTRACT Pay gaps, like gender or racial gaps, violate the widely held belief that employees should receive equal pay for equal work. This study examines whether a common control choice—framing pay raise budgets in percentages—contributes to perpetuating pay gaps. We predict that when the pay raise budget is framed as a percentage (the percentage frame), it inadvertently nudges managers to anchor individual raises on that budget percentage, thereby impounding prior salaries, and thus, existing inequities, into pay raises. We further predict that framing the pay raise budget as an absolute amount (the dollar frame) can un-nudge this behavior. As expected, we find in two experiments that the dollar frame perpetuates pay gaps less than the percentage frame, and that this difference is robust to varying levels of ambiguity about the source of salary differences. Our study examines a simple, cost-effective way to limit the perpetuation of pay gaps. Data Availability: Contact the authors. JEL Classifications: D91; J16; J31; J71; M40; M52.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0105
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Un-Nudging Pay Gaps: The Role of Pay Raise Budget Framing

Karl Schuhmacher, Kristy L. Towry, Hayden T. Gunnell
The Accounting Review
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Un-Nudging Pay Gaps: The Role of Pay Raise Budget Framing

Karl Schuhmacher, Kristy L. Towry, Hayden T. Gunnell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pay gaps, like gender or racial gaps, violate the widely held belief that employees should receive equal pay for equal work. This study examines whether a common control choice—framing pay raise budgets in percentages—contributes to perpetuating pay gaps. We predict that when the pay raise budget is framed as a percentage (the percentage frame), it inadvertently nudges managers to anchor individual raises on that budget percentage, thereby impounding prior salaries, and thus, existing inequities, into pay raises. We further predict that framing the pay raise budget as an absolute amount (the dollar frame) can un-nudge this behavior. As expected, we find in two experiments that the dollar frame perpetuates pay gaps less than the percentage frame, and that this difference is robust to varying levels of ambiguity about the source of salary differences. Our study examines a simple, cost-effective way to limit the perpetuation of pay gaps. Data Availability: Contact the authors. JEL Classifications: D91; J16; J31; J71; M40; M52.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 101(2)
Emory University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.