How Do Nasopharyngoscopy Ratings of Sustained Speech Differ From Connected Speech?

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship in ratings of velopharyngeal closure between connected speech and sustained speech, as visualized on nasopharyngoscopy.DesignProspective observational study.SettingCraniofacial clinics in the United States and Canada.ParticipantsFifty-two participants with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) who underwent nasopharyngoscopy and produced both connected speech and sustained speech of either /i/or /s/ during the procedure.Main outcome measure(s)Correlations and differences between connected speech and sustained speech for velopharyngeal closure percentage, velar movement, lateral pharyngeal wall movement, and velopharyngeal closure pattern.ResultsThere were moderate to very strong correlations observed between connected speech and sustained /i/ for velopharyngeal closure percentage (<i>P</i> < .01); extent of velar movement (<i>P</i> < .01), and left (<i>P</i> < .01) and right (<i>P</i> < .01) lateral pharyngeal wall movement. Findings were similar between connected speech and sustained /s/. Differences between ratings made during connected and sustained speech were small: for velopharyngeal closure percentage, there was a 5% difference in the mean between connected speech and sustained /i/ (77.5% vs 72.5%) and a 7% difference for /s/ (79.3% vs 86.7%). Overall differences across ratings ranged from 2% to 12%. Closure pattern was rated the same for both connected speech and sustained /i/ in 90% of videos (n = 44/49; <i>P</i> = .38) and the same for connected speech and sustained /s/ in 95% of videos (n = 42/44; <i>P</i> = 1.00).ConclusionsRatings of velopharyngeal movement during nasopharyngoscopy are similar between connected speech and sustained /i/ and /s/ suggesting elicitation of only sustained /i/ and /s/ may be adequate in most cases when assessment of connected speech is not possible.