A Qualitative Observation Tool for Folding, Writing, and Cutting in School-Aged Children: Hands-On!

<b>Background.</b> Fine motor skills such as folding, writing, and cutting are daily activities of children, yet reliable, valid tools to qualitatively assess these skills remain limited. <b>Purpose.</b> To develop the Hands-On! observation tool and evaluate its reliability and validity in assessing fine motor skills in 5- to 10-year-old children. <b>Method.</b> Hands-On! was created using literature review and expert feedback to determine intratask components for folding, writing, and cutting. The sample included 178 typically developing children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> 8.06 ± 1.58 years, 47.8% boys). Inter- and intraobserver reliability were measured, alongside concurrent (duration and errors DCDDaily) and construct validity (age, sex) for each task. <b>Findings.</b> Moderate to very strong interobserver (folding 84.5%-84.9%, writing 81.8%-86.0%, cutting 75.4%-83.8%) and intraobserver reliability (folding 92.8%, writing 91.7%, cutting 93.7%) were found. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations between qualitative scores for folding (ρ<sub>duration</sub> = 0.624, ρ<sub>folds</sub> = -0.441) and cutting (ρ<sub>duration</sub> = 0.335, ρ<sub>errors</sub> = 0.377) with DCDDaily metrics, though no significant correlation was found for writing. Construct validity was supported for folding and cutting, with age and sex explaining 22.1% and 14.1% of the variance. <b>Conclusion.</b> Hands-On! is a reliable and valid qualitative observation tool for assessing fine motor skills in children, enhancing assessment practices, and informing effective interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251397726
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Observation Tool for Folding, Writing, and Cutting in School-Aged Children: Hands-On!

Esther Hartman, Dagmar F. A. A. Derikx, Marina M. Schoemaker, Maaike G. A. Steggink et al.
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

A Qualitative Observation Tool for Folding, Writing, and Cutting in School-Aged Children: Hands-On!

Esther Hartman, Dagmar F. A. A. Derikx, Marina M. Schoemaker, Maaike G. A. Steggink, Suzanne Houwen, Leila Faber
article en

Abstract

<b>Background.</b> Fine motor skills such as folding, writing, and cutting are daily activities of children, yet reliable, valid tools to qualitatively assess these skills remain limited. <b>Purpose.</b> To develop the Hands-On! observation tool and evaluate its reliability and validity in assessing fine motor skills in 5- to 10-year-old children. <b>Method.</b> Hands-On! was created using literature review and expert feedback to determine intratask components for folding, writing, and cutting. The sample included 178 typically developing children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> 8.06 ± 1.58 years, 47.8% boys). Inter- and intraobserver reliability were measured, alongside concurrent (duration and errors DCDDaily) and construct validity (age, sex) for each task. <b>Findings.</b> Moderate to very strong interobserver (folding 84.5%-84.9%, writing 81.8%-86.0%, cutting 75.4%-83.8%) and intraobserver reliability (folding 92.8%, writing 91.7%, cutting 93.7%) were found. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations between qualitative scores for folding (ρ<sub>duration</sub> = 0.624, ρ<sub>folds</sub> = -0.441) and cutting (ρ<sub>duration</sub> = 0.335, ρ<sub>errors</sub> = 0.377) with DCDDaily metrics, though no significant correlation was found for writing. Construct validity was supported for folding and cutting, with age and sex explaining 22.1% and 14.1% of the variance. <b>Conclusion.</b> Hands-On! is a reliable and valid qualitative observation tool for assessing fine motor skills in children, enhancing assessment practices, and informing effective interventions.

Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.