Punish or forgive? Exploring the mediating role of perceived CEO attitude on the interaction of emotional crisis communication and crisis type

This study explores how crisis type, specifically product-harm (i.e., performance-related) vs. moral-harm (i.e., value-related) and CEO’s emotional expression (anger vs. shame) in organizational crisis response affect publics’ punishment expectations and forgiveness after a crisis. Additionally, it examines the mediating roles of perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) in these relationships. Using a 2 (crisis type: product-harm vs. moral-harm) × 2 (CEO emotional expression: anger vs. shame) between-subjects design ( N = 406, recruited via CloudResearch), the results showed that a product-harm crisis significantly triggered higher punishment expectations and lower forgiveness compared to a moral-harm crisis. However, contrary to expectations, the CEO’s emotional expression did not directly influence the intended punishment or forgiveness. Furthermore, perceived CEO attitudes (i.e., arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediated these effects on intended behaviors among participants. Significant moderated mediation effects were detected when the CEO expressed anger. In product-harm crises, such expressions of anger reduced perceptions of the CEO’s sincerity and increased perceptions of arrogance, which in turn heightened punishment expectations and lowered forgiveness. Both theoretical and practical implications of the current study are discussed. • This study explores how crisis type and CEO emotional expression affect public intentions to punish or forgive an organization. • Product-harm crises lead to more punishment and less forgiveness, especially when the CEO expresses anger. • Perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediate the effects of crisis type and emotional response on public reactions. • Findings offer new theoretical insights and practical guidance for tailoring emotional tone and leadership communication in crisis response strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Review
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102651
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punish or forgive? Exploring the mediating role of perceived CEO attitude on the interaction of emotional crisis communication and crisis type

Qi Zheng, James Ndone, Margaret E. Duffy, Rongting Niu et al.
Public Relations Review
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Punish or forgive? Exploring the mediating role of perceived CEO attitude on the interaction of emotional crisis communication and crisis type

Qi Zheng, James Ndone, Margaret E. Duffy, Rongting Niu, Yan Jin
article en

Abstract

This study explores how crisis type, specifically product-harm (i.e., performance-related) vs. moral-harm (i.e., value-related) and CEO’s emotional expression (anger vs. shame) in organizational crisis response affect publics’ punishment expectations and forgiveness after a crisis. Additionally, it examines the mediating roles of perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) in these relationships. Using a 2 (crisis type: product-harm vs. moral-harm) × 2 (CEO emotional expression: anger vs. shame) between-subjects design ( N = 406, recruited via CloudResearch), the results showed that a product-harm crisis significantly triggered higher punishment expectations and lower forgiveness compared to a moral-harm crisis. However, contrary to expectations, the CEO’s emotional expression did not directly influence the intended punishment or forgiveness. Furthermore, perceived CEO attitudes (i.e., arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediated these effects on intended behaviors among participants. Significant moderated mediation effects were detected when the CEO expressed anger. In product-harm crises, such expressions of anger reduced perceptions of the CEO’s sincerity and increased perceptions of arrogance, which in turn heightened punishment expectations and lowered forgiveness. Both theoretical and practical implications of the current study are discussed. • This study explores how crisis type and CEO emotional expression affect public intentions to punish or forgive an organization. • Product-harm crises lead to more punishment and less forgiveness, especially when the CEO expresses anger. • Perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediate the effects of crisis type and emotional response on public reactions. • Findings offer new theoretical insights and practical guidance for tailoring emotional tone and leadership communication in crisis response strategies.

Public Relations ReviewVol. 52(1)
Grady Memorial Hospital (US), University of Georgia (US), Coastal Carolina University (US), University of Missouri (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.