Aldehydes are key for assessing dietary lipid oxidation and subsequent effects on pig growth performance

The relationship between lipid oxidation products (LOP) and pig performance is complicated by the dynamic process of lipid oxidation and the complex biochemical and physiological process of pig growth. Past experiments and reviews of scientific literature have revealed the shortcomings of common primary and secondary LOP parameters, such as peroxide value (PV), anisidine value (AnV), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), in characterizing lipid oxidation and predicting pig growth performance. A review of 16 publications indicated that lipids rich in saturated fatty acids (e.g., lard, palm oil, and tallow) are less prone to oxidation resulting in no significant associations between their LOP and pig performance (average daily gain, ADG; average daily feed intake, ADFI; gain:feed, GF). In contrast, lipids rich in unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil) can be readily oxidized to form LOP resulting in negative correlations between their LOP and pig performance. Using the dietary concentrations of PV and AnV in unsaturated lipids with pig performance predicted reductions of pig performance (using 100% for response of control animals) with moderate accuracy: ADG = 100.2 - (0.37 × PV) - (0.88 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 68, R2 = 0.72; ADFI = 99.6 - (0.28 × PV) - (0.52 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 47, R2 = 0.57; GF = 100.9 - (0.10 × PV) - (0.46 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 20, R2 = 0.69. Furthermore, the accuracy of lipidic aldehydes to predict the growth performance of pigs fed unsaturated lipids was examined using stepwise regression analysis, showing that 2-undecenal, 4-hydroxynonenal, 2,4-undecadienal, and pentanal were most predictive of the reduction in ADG (P = 0.01, SD = 68, R2 = 0.77); hexanal, 2-undecenal, 2,4-undecadienal, 2-heptenal, and 4-hydroxynonenal were most predictive of the reduction in ADFI (P = 0.01, SD = 43, R2 = 0.68); and 4-hydroxynonenal, 2-undecenal, 2,4-heptadienal, pentanal, hexanal, 2-decenal, and 2-octenal were most predictive of the reduction in GF (P = 0.01, SD = 13, R2 = 0.85). While the use of targeted aldehydes improved the accuracy of predicting growth performance reductions caused by the consumption of oxidized unsaturated lipids, the improvement in prediction accuracy of ADG and ADFI was minimal. In conclusion, LOP parameters, either a combination of PV and AnV measures or combinations of specific aldehydes, can reasonably estimate the negative impact of feeding oxidized lipids on pig performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf407
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aldehydes are key for assessing dietary lipid oxidation and subsequent effects on pig growth performance

Yuan-Tai Hung, B. J. Kerr, G. C. Shurson, Chi Chen
Journal of Animal Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Aldehydes are key for assessing dietary lipid oxidation and subsequent effects on pig growth performance

Yuan-Tai Hung, B. J. Kerr, G. C. Shurson, Chi Chen
article en

Abstract

The relationship between lipid oxidation products (LOP) and pig performance is complicated by the dynamic process of lipid oxidation and the complex biochemical and physiological process of pig growth. Past experiments and reviews of scientific literature have revealed the shortcomings of common primary and secondary LOP parameters, such as peroxide value (PV), anisidine value (AnV), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), in characterizing lipid oxidation and predicting pig growth performance. A review of 16 publications indicated that lipids rich in saturated fatty acids (e.g., lard, palm oil, and tallow) are less prone to oxidation resulting in no significant associations between their LOP and pig performance (average daily gain, ADG; average daily feed intake, ADFI; gain:feed, GF). In contrast, lipids rich in unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil) can be readily oxidized to form LOP resulting in negative correlations between their LOP and pig performance. Using the dietary concentrations of PV and AnV in unsaturated lipids with pig performance predicted reductions of pig performance (using 100% for response of control animals) with moderate accuracy: ADG = 100.2 - (0.37 × PV) - (0.88 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 68, R2 = 0.72; ADFI = 99.6 - (0.28 × PV) - (0.52 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 47, R2 = 0.57; GF = 100.9 - (0.10 × PV) - (0.46 × AnV); P = 0.01, SD = 20, R2 = 0.69. Furthermore, the accuracy of lipidic aldehydes to predict the growth performance of pigs fed unsaturated lipids was examined using stepwise regression analysis, showing that 2-undecenal, 4-hydroxynonenal, 2,4-undecadienal, and pentanal were most predictive of the reduction in ADG (P = 0.01, SD = 68, R2 = 0.77); hexanal, 2-undecenal, 2,4-undecadienal, 2-heptenal, and 4-hydroxynonenal were most predictive of the reduction in ADFI (P = 0.01, SD = 43, R2 = 0.68); and 4-hydroxynonenal, 2-undecenal, 2,4-heptadienal, pentanal, hexanal, 2-decenal, and 2-octenal were most predictive of the reduction in GF (P = 0.01, SD = 13, R2 = 0.85). While the use of targeted aldehydes improved the accuracy of predicting growth performance reductions caused by the consumption of oxidized unsaturated lipids, the improvement in prediction accuracy of ADG and ADFI was minimal. In conclusion, LOP parameters, either a combination of PV and AnV measures or combinations of specific aldehydes, can reasonably estimate the negative impact of feeding oxidized lipids on pig performance.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104
University of Minnesota (US), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.