Assessment of the Accuracy of ISRIC and ESDAC Soil Texture Data Compared to the Soil Map of Greece: A Statistical and Spatial Approach to Identify Sources of Differences

Soil maps are essential for managing Earth’s resources, but the accuracy of widely used global and pan-European digital soil maps in heterogeneous landscapes remains a critical concern. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of two prominent datasets, ISRIC-SoilGrids and the European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC), by comparing their soil texture predictions against the detailed Greek National Soil Map, which is based on over 10,000 field samples. The results from statistical and spatial analyses reveal significant discrepancies and weak correlations, with a very low overall accuracy for soil texture class prediction (19–21%) and high Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values ranging from 13% to 19%. The global models failed to capture local variability, showing very low explanatory power (R2 < 0.2) and systematically underrepresenting soils with extreme textures. Furthermore, these prediction errors are not entirely random but are significantly clustered in hot spots linked to distinct parent materials and geomorphological features. Our findings demonstrate that while invaluable for large-scale assessments, the direct application of global soil databases for regional policy or precision agriculture in a geologically complex country like Greece is subject to considerable uncertainty, highlighting the critical need for local calibration and the integration of national datasets to improve the reliability of soil information.