Impact of biologic therapy on the cumulative and running societal financial burden of severe asthma – a 19-year cost analysis

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Severe asthma incurs a financial burden for both patients and society. Yet, little is known about the long-term financial burden, and the impact of biologic therapy. <bold>Methods:</bold> All Danish adults initiating biologic therapy for severe asthma between 2016-20 were included and had their excess healthcare costs, forgone income and welfare transfers compared to matched controls. Patients were followed prior to and after biologic initiation between 2002-22. <bold>Results:</bold> In total, 562 patients (median age 56, 51% female) were included and consistently had excess costs compared to comparators (Figure 1). Excess healthcare costs during the year prior to biologic therapy was € 10,590 and foregone income was € 5,389 per patient. Excess welfare transfers for patients aged 18-64 were € 3,335. Prior to biologic therapy, pooling of patients' mean crude annual costs resulted in accumulation of €59,364 and €44,155 in excess healthcare costs and foregone income, respectively. Patients aged 18-64 had accumulated €32,021 in excess welfare transfers. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> In our study, patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy accumulate a substantial financial burden for both healthcare and welfare institutions, as well as significant loss of personal income over time. Biologic therapy significantly increased healthcare costs overall but did not seem to impact welfare transfers or foregone income. <fig><object-id>erj;66/suppl_69/PA2609/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2025.pa2609
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of biologic therapy on the cumulative and running societal financial burden of severe asthma – a 19-year cost analysis

Barbara Bonnesen, Anna von Bülow, Anders Løkke, Marianne Baastrup Soendergaard et al.
Epidemiology
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Impact of biologic therapy on the cumulative and running societal financial burden of severe asthma – a 19-year cost analysis

Barbara Bonnesen, Anna von Bülow, Anders Løkke, Marianne Baastrup Soendergaard, Ole Hilberg, Lycely Dongo, Roxana Vijdea, Maria Bisgaard Borup, Kjell Erik Julius Håkansson, Johannes Martin Schmid, Celeste Porsbjerg, Rikke Ibsen, Claus Rikard Johnsen, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Susanne Hansen, Anne‐Sofie Bjerrum, Sofie Johansson, Linda Makowska Rasmussen, Niels Steen Krogh
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Severe asthma incurs a financial burden for both patients and society. Yet, little is known about the long-term financial burden, and the impact of biologic therapy. <bold>Methods:</bold> All Danish adults initiating biologic therapy for severe asthma between 2016-20 were included and had their excess healthcare costs, forgone income and welfare transfers compared to matched controls. Patients were followed prior to and after biologic initiation between 2002-22. <bold>Results:</bold> In total, 562 patients (median age 56, 51% female) were included and consistently had excess costs compared to comparators (Figure 1). Excess healthcare costs during the year prior to biologic therapy was € 10,590 and foregone income was € 5,389 per patient. Excess welfare transfers for patients aged 18-64 were € 3,335. Prior to biologic therapy, pooling of patients' mean crude annual costs resulted in accumulation of €59,364 and €44,155 in excess healthcare costs and foregone income, respectively. Patients aged 18-64 had accumulated €32,021 in excess welfare transfers. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> In our study, patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy accumulate a substantial financial burden for both healthcare and welfare institutions, as well as significant loss of personal income over time. Biologic therapy significantly increased healthcare costs overall but did not seem to impact welfare transfers or foregone income. <fig><object-id>erj;66/suppl_69/PA2609/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Epidemiology
Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Vejle Sygehus (DK), Arla Foods (Denmark) (DK), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.